<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: alternate to the internal elevation tool? in Archicad C++ API</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48658#M8001</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Aussie wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Select a section/elevation line on plan and automatically extend it to the boundary of a (selected) zone (or zone boundary). Maybe even give the section the elevation parameters of the zone and automatically place the other elevations lines&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I know it is a bit limited, but does the existing "Interior Elevation" tool help you at all?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:09:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ralph Wessel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-03-23T12:09:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>alternate to the internal elevation tool?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48656#M7999</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;Hi I am wondering is this is something that could be achieved with an API add-on.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Select a section/elevation line on plan and automatically extend it to the boundary of a (selected) zone (or zone boundary). Maybe even give the section the elevation parameters of the zone and automatically place the other elevations lines&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I do all my internal elevations with individual sections and thought this could be a useful tool.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 10:11:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48656#M7999</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aussie John</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-07T10:11:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: alternate to the internal elevation tool?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48657#M8000</link>
      <description>It seems like something that COULD be done. The hard part would be getting someone to pull it off. The API can be a little..... limiting at times,</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:11:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48657#M8000</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-22T22:11:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: alternate to the internal elevation tool?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48658#M8001</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Aussie wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Select a section/elevation line on plan and automatically extend it to the boundary of a (selected) zone (or zone boundary). Maybe even give the section the elevation parameters of the zone and automatically place the other elevations lines&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I know it is a bit limited, but does the existing "Interior Elevation" tool help you at all?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:09:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48658#M8001</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Wessel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-23T12:09:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: alternate to the internal elevation tool?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48659#M8002</link>
      <description>personaly I have never tried to develop any APIs but to me that sounds like a good idea to use the interior elevations as a guide</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:35:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48659#M8002</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aussie John</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-23T21:35:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: alternate to the internal elevation tool?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48660#M8003</link>
      <description>Sounds like a good idea, John.  The Interior Elevation Tool itself is too limited (not "live" being the biggest thing) ... so automatic placement of sections for a live interior elevation would be nice.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Seems pretty straightforward.  The geometry of the selected zone can be read by an add-on, and the selected sections could have their extents (end points, top and bottom elevations and depth) appropriately modified.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm a little busy for the next month, or I'd look at it more right now...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:45:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48660#M8003</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-24T20:45:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: alternate to the internal elevation tool?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48661#M8004</link>
      <description>I know the feeling too Karl &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_lol.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:11:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/alternate-to-the-internal-elevation-tool/m-p/48661#M8004</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aussie John</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-25T00:11:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

