<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Development in C# anyone? in Archicad C++ API</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/Development-in-C-anyone/m-p/59773#M8027</link>
    <description>I experimented with this a little bit, but in an other direction.&lt;BR /&gt;
I wanted use C# ( or any NET language ) assemblies from an usual Addon&lt;BR /&gt;
for implementing some project's tasks in C#. ( I did not think of use C#&lt;BR /&gt;
for writing an Addon and call API functions from it ).&lt;BR /&gt;
The It Just Works technology allows to mix a managed and unmanaged&lt;BR /&gt;
code in C++ and accordingly use C# assemblies from the C++ AddOn.&lt;BR /&gt;
Actually it may work, but perhaps it make sense for big and specific projects and unfortunately it is impossible to use Windows.Forms.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 16:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Oleg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-05-03T16:30:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Development in C# anyone?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/Development-in-C-anyone/m-p/59771#M8025</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;Has anyone given this a try yet?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've read the 'Non Visual C++ Development' document several times now. I figured I'd at least see what happens. It shouldn't be hard in C# to use the ACAP_DLL.apx or to implement the initialization and termination functions, but I'm wondering if I'd have to reimplement all of the header files and methods for getting function addresses....&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If anyone has tried and had success or knows it won't work without a large investment of time, can you share some insight?&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 10:08:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/Development-in-C-anyone/m-p/59771#M8025</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-07T10:08:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Development in C# anyone?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/Development-in-C-anyone/m-p/59772#M8026</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Ramblin wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Has anyone given this a try yet?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I've read the 'Non Visual C++ Development' document several times now. I figured I'd at least see what happens. It shouldn't be hard in C# to use the ACAP_DLL.apx or to implement the initialization and termination functions, but I'm wondering if I'd have to reimplement all of the header files and methods for getting function addresses....&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If anyone has tried and had success or knows it won't work without a large investment of time, can you share some insight?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I don't know anyone who has ever tried that. Take a look at the DLL_Test example in the DevKit, that moight point you to the right direction. I think the biggest problem is not with functions (the API interface is simple C), rather than with the data structures.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
HTH,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Akos</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 11:59:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/Development-in-C-anyone/m-p/59772#M8026</guid>
      <dc:creator>Akos Somorjai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-03T11:59:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Development in C# anyone?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/Development-in-C-anyone/m-p/59773#M8027</link>
      <description>I experimented with this a little bit, but in an other direction.&lt;BR /&gt;
I wanted use C# ( or any NET language ) assemblies from an usual Addon&lt;BR /&gt;
for implementing some project's tasks in C#. ( I did not think of use C#&lt;BR /&gt;
for writing an Addon and call API functions from it ).&lt;BR /&gt;
The It Just Works technology allows to mix a managed and unmanaged&lt;BR /&gt;
code in C++ and accordingly use C# assemblies from the C++ AddOn.&lt;BR /&gt;
Actually it may work, but perhaps it make sense for big and specific projects and unfortunately it is impossible to use Windows.Forms.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 16:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/Development-in-C-anyone/m-p/59773#M8027</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oleg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-03T16:30:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

