<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How to get further community access? in Archicad C++ API</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/How-to-get-further-community-access/m-p/573537#M8810</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am struggling to update our Archicad plugin to support Archicad 27 - it seems like an issue with one or more of the header files provided in the SDK. Googling the issue, this URL turned up:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Graphisoft-Technology-Preview/API-PenType-datatype-missing-in-header-APIdefs-Attributes-h-in/td-p/394692" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Graphisoft-Technology-Preview/API-PenType-datatype-missing-in-header-APIdefs-Attributes-h-in/td-p/394692&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;While it seemed very promising from the results page, I am not able to access the page. Says I do not have sufficient privileges to access the page.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Right now it feels like I've hit a brick wall in the effort to add Archicad 27 support to our product.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bitwreckage</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-16T12:56:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to get further community access?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/How-to-get-further-community-access/m-p/573537#M8810</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am struggling to update our Archicad plugin to support Archicad 27 - it seems like an issue with one or more of the header files provided in the SDK. Googling the issue, this URL turned up:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Graphisoft-Technology-Preview/API-PenType-datatype-missing-in-header-APIdefs-Attributes-h-in/td-p/394692" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Graphisoft-Technology-Preview/API-PenType-datatype-missing-in-header-APIdefs-Attributes-h-in/td-p/394692&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;While it seemed very promising from the results page, I am not able to access the page. Says I do not have sufficient privileges to access the page.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Right now it feels like I've hit a brick wall in the effort to add Archicad 27 support to our product.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/How-to-get-further-community-access/m-p/573537#M8810</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bitwreckage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-16T12:56:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to get further community access?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/How-to-get-further-community-access/m-p/573686#M8811</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/49725"&gt;@Bitwreckage&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Graphisoft Technology Preview Program for this year is closed already, this is why you can't access the above mentioned page.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The solution&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/26198"&gt;@eptar&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;shared there was this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since we started the migration with the beta, the mentioned header came a bit late for us, we already made the majority of these functions, and did not use it (so far).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Basically ACAPI_Interface, ACAPI_Environment, ACAPI_Database kind of functions are gone (those which had a the first parameter as some kind of ID).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What we did is searching in the inc folder for the term cutting off the "ID" part and the prefix. So for example in case of APIIo_SetProcessOnOffSwitchID we were looking for SetProcessOnOffSwitch and the majority of the required functions we could find. In the mentioned case ACAPI_Interface(APIIo_SetProcessOnOffSwitchID, bool*) became ACAPI_ProcessWindow_SetProcessOnOffSwitch(bool*)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I admit that this can take quite some time. (This is how we found the confusion around the regular and solid linking topic.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Instead of API_PenType there is API_Pen from now on, it is not part of the API_Attribute union anymore. This is not just renaming, all the related functions are different now. So number of pens is retrieved now with the&amp;nbsp;ACAPI_Attribute_GetPenNum function and there is a&amp;nbsp;ACAPI_Attribute_GetPen function to get the details of a pen instead of doing these through API_Attribute structure.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Noémi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 07:36:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/How-to-get-further-community-access/m-p/573686#M8811</guid>
      <dc:creator>Noemi Balogh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-02T07:36:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to get further community access?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/How-to-get-further-community-access/m-p/573957#M8818</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Noémi!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have already started down a path of migration now, which is time-consuming, but at least I am moving forward.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The quoted answer you supplied gave me further confirmation that I am probably on the right path. Specifically the subject of API_PenType to API_Pen I think is valuable info also when trying to figure out what to do about API_PenIDs currently referenced in our code, but which does not seem to be a thing in AC27.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;--&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Kind regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Steffen Skov&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 15:23:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/How-to-get-further-community-access/m-p/573957#M8818</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bitwreckage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-03T15:23:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to get further community access?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/How-to-get-further-community-access/m-p/574029#M8821</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Steffen,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just one general tip for AC27 Migration in case you are not doing that anyway: You can use the &lt;STRONG&gt;ACAPI_MigrationHeader.hpp&lt;/STRONG&gt; included in the AC27 DevKit. It needs some adaptions since there are some errors in it, but for me the migrations were simplified a lot by using it. For example I changed all the function definitions to &lt;EM&gt;inline&lt;/EM&gt; for easier including.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also something that tripped me up a bunch was forgetting to include the module "CADInfrastructureBase". It seems to be necessary in more situations since AC27.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;BR /&gt;Bernd&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2023 08:25:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Archicad-C-API/How-to-get-further-community-access/m-p/574029#M8821</guid>
      <dc:creator>BerndSchwarzenbacher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-04T08:25:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

