topic Re: Beam Length Left vs 3D Length discrepancy in schedule in Project data & BIM

Beam Length Left vs 3D Length discrepancy in schedule

Streamline JG — Fri, 25 Oct 2024 20:29:22 GMT

Creating a beam schedule, we're used to using "Length Left" for beams, but it's not taking the mitred ends into consideration as they are opposite the beam length (example:)

Okay, so to get around this, I have found that "3D Length" shows the accurate beam length (125.14"). However, when put into the schedule, the "3D Length" items are summed together when the "Length Left" items remain the length for one individual item (which is what we want).

See highlight for beam shown above. Quantity is 2, so we are seeing 3D Length as 250.28", but we just want the individual length of 125.14" to show. Any ideas?

Re: Beam Length Left vs 3D Length discrepancy in schedule

Ricardo Lopez — Wed, 30 Oct 2024 00:42:31 GMT

Hi @Streamline JG

Create a new String property (Ex: 3D_L) available for Beams with the expression: STRCALCUNIT ( 3D Length )

Creat a new String property (Ex: 3D_BL) avaliable for Beams with the expression: 3D_L

Add 3D_BL to your Schedule

I don't know why the first one is merged even as a string, but if you create a second one just like that it is not merged. 🤔

Regards

Re: Beam Length Left vs 3D Length discrepancy in schedule

Streamline JG — Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:30:08 GMT

Thanks, I'm giving that a try but I am getting "Syntax error in Expression" when trying to create the new String property STRCALCUNIT ( 3D Length ). I think I might be missing a step?

Re: Beam Length Left vs 3D Length discrepancy in schedule

Ricardo Lopez — Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:35:49 GMT

Do not write "3D Length", you have to select it from the list of properties it should appear with a grey background.

Re: Beam Length Left vs 3D Length discrepancy in schedule

Streamline JG — Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:45:05 GMT

Thank you, that worked, just had to add the parenthesis manually and I think it's working as intended now. Appreciate your help!