<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Project Indexes and schedules significantly increasing file size in Project data &amp; BIM</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Project-Indexes-and-schedules-significantly-increasing-file-size/m-p/642537#M11276</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="KellyatKanviHomes_0-1733413820072.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/80508iBF31CD37BF1A59D0/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="KellyatKanviHomes_0-1733413820072.png" alt="KellyatKanviHomes_0-1733413820072.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I examined our latest project with the following specs:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- 3000 sq ft two story home w/ walkout basement &amp;amp; triple garage&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- fully modeled in 3D with a number of downloaded objects, mostly plumbing fixtures from Kohler, but no 3D furniture&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- 91 quantity schedules&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- 8 project indexes&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- embedded library is empty&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The final size of this file was 345,138 kb and performance in saving, switching views, updating drawings, etc is noticeably slow.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Major contributors to file size were 4 sections (14,245 kb), 6 elevations (5,399 kb), 44 interior elevations (18,643 kb), and favorites (8,279 kb), all of which are to be expected for a project like this. However, it turns out that 58% of the file size was in the schedules (154,862 kb) and project indexes (46,102 kb).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Even in our empty template, which starts at 270,237 kb with nothing modeled, the schedules contribute 145,380 kb and the project indexes are 40,279 kb, or 69% of our template file size. Why are the schedules so big if there is nothing modeled?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm curious how much your project indexes and schedules are affecting your file size and what you have done to improve it???&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" color="grey"&gt;Operating system used: &lt;EM&gt;Mac Intel-based 10.0.19045&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 16:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kelly at Kanvi Homes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-13T16:55:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Project Indexes and schedules significantly increasing file size</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Project-Indexes-and-schedules-significantly-increasing-file-size/m-p/642537#M11276</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="KellyatKanviHomes_0-1733413820072.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/80508iBF31CD37BF1A59D0/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="KellyatKanviHomes_0-1733413820072.png" alt="KellyatKanviHomes_0-1733413820072.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I examined our latest project with the following specs:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- 3000 sq ft two story home w/ walkout basement &amp;amp; triple garage&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- fully modeled in 3D with a number of downloaded objects, mostly plumbing fixtures from Kohler, but no 3D furniture&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- 91 quantity schedules&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- 8 project indexes&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- embedded library is empty&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The final size of this file was 345,138 kb and performance in saving, switching views, updating drawings, etc is noticeably slow.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Major contributors to file size were 4 sections (14,245 kb), 6 elevations (5,399 kb), 44 interior elevations (18,643 kb), and favorites (8,279 kb), all of which are to be expected for a project like this. However, it turns out that 58% of the file size was in the schedules (154,862 kb) and project indexes (46,102 kb).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Even in our empty template, which starts at 270,237 kb with nothing modeled, the schedules contribute 145,380 kb and the project indexes are 40,279 kb, or 69% of our template file size. Why are the schedules so big if there is nothing modeled?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm curious how much your project indexes and schedules are affecting your file size and what you have done to improve it???&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" color="grey"&gt;Operating system used: &lt;EM&gt;Mac Intel-based 10.0.19045&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 16:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Project-Indexes-and-schedules-significantly-increasing-file-size/m-p/642537#M11276</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kelly at Kanvi Homes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-13T16:55:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

