<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Layers for All Occasions !!! without being too complex. in Project data &amp; BIM</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14034#M2331</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;I have recently set-up a company standard layering convention (AC10) that was based around the previous office standard (AC9) set up by my predecessor. The reason I've had to do this is because all of the users have complained that it is &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;'far to complex'&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My problem is that we are a multi-disciplined practise and most of our projects demand a certain layering convention. I'd like to create a basic set of layers and then include project specific layers.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I understand the theory, however I would like an idea of a simple method of applying and maintaining it efficiently.&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:53:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-23T11:53:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Layers for All Occasions !!! without being too complex.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14034#M2331</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;I have recently set-up a company standard layering convention (AC10) that was based around the previous office standard (AC9) set up by my predecessor. The reason I've had to do this is because all of the users have complained that it is &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;'far to complex'&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My problem is that we are a multi-disciplined practise and most of our projects demand a certain layering convention. I'd like to create a basic set of layers and then include project specific layers.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I understand the theory, however I would like an idea of a simple method of applying and maintaining it efficiently.&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:53:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14034#M2331</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-23T11:53:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layers for All Occasions !!! without being too complex.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14035#M2332</link>
      <description>You don't give us a lot to go on... &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What did your layers look like?  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Was it your standard that they felt is too complex? Or the standard you are revising was too complex? Either way, why did the staff feel the standard was too complex?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14035#M2332</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-23T13:18:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layers for All Occasions !!! without being too complex.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14036#M2333</link>
      <description>The users felt that is was too complex, because it tried to combine different layers for different scales, as well as, different projects. See attached file, that shows original layers from AC9.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:51:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14036#M2333</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-23T14:51:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layers for All Occasions !!! without being too complex.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14037#M2334</link>
      <description>What attached file?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:59:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14037#M2334</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-23T14:59:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layers for All Occasions !!! without being too complex.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14038#M2335</link>
      <description>For some reason, I'm having an issue with attaching an image file. I will email the file to you.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:10:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14038#M2335</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-23T15:10:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layers for All Occasions !!! without being too complex.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14039#M2336</link>
      <description>Thank you for all your help TomWaltz. We're successfully created a basic system that everyone is happy with.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Many thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:04:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14039#M2336</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-17T11:04:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layers for All Occasions !!! without being too complex.</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14040#M2337</link>
      <description>what was the soloution?&lt;BR /&gt;
i'm interested, too</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 22:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Layers-for-All-Occasions-without-being-too-complex/m-p/14040#M2337</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-03T22:22:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

