<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic show zones in section - intersection with cutted elements in Project data &amp; BIM</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/show-zones-in-section-intersection-with-cutted-elements/m-p/376046#M325</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello togehter&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to change the priority for the intersection of zones &amp;amp; other elements in the section?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What we want to do:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Drawing one big Morph over the hole project.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Drawing the zones with a white background.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- In the floor plan we get now "normal" floor plans, which are looking like there were walls, but actually there's a morph in the background and a zone in the front.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- In the section we get the problem, that the zones only are visible (the contour line is visible, but the fill not) when we hide the morph-element.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Workaround: Hide the morph and do two different drawings which are layouted both on the same paper. Any other "better" solutions to solve this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Reason why we're doing that: We need in the early project phases only an ifc with zones and with this workflow our architects in the office are much faster. The goals is to get a correct zone model instead of a complicate wall/ slab model which is not correct. Afterwards we threw the zone-model into the platform abstractbim and get a structured ifc for cost-simulations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bimdo_0-1680971432302.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/35989i79E096BE59A9D480/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="bimdo_0-1680971432302.png" alt="bimdo_0-1680971432302.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bimdo_1-1680971602254.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/35990iBE3F5640C22C3EC9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="bimdo_1-1680971602254.png" alt="bimdo_1-1680971602254.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 22:56:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bimdo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-19T22:56:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>show zones in section - intersection with cutted elements</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/show-zones-in-section-intersection-with-cutted-elements/m-p/376046#M325</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello togehter&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to change the priority for the intersection of zones &amp;amp; other elements in the section?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What we want to do:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Drawing one big Morph over the hole project.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Drawing the zones with a white background.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- In the floor plan we get now "normal" floor plans, which are looking like there were walls, but actually there's a morph in the background and a zone in the front.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- In the section we get the problem, that the zones only are visible (the contour line is visible, but the fill not) when we hide the morph-element.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Workaround: Hide the morph and do two different drawings which are layouted both on the same paper. Any other "better" solutions to solve this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Reason why we're doing that: We need in the early project phases only an ifc with zones and with this workflow our architects in the office are much faster. The goals is to get a correct zone model instead of a complicate wall/ slab model which is not correct. Afterwards we threw the zone-model into the platform abstractbim and get a structured ifc for cost-simulations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bimdo_0-1680971432302.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/35989i79E096BE59A9D480/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="bimdo_0-1680971432302.png" alt="bimdo_0-1680971432302.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bimdo_1-1680971602254.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/35990iBE3F5640C22C3EC9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="bimdo_1-1680971602254.png" alt="bimdo_1-1680971602254.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 22:56:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/show-zones-in-section-intersection-with-cutted-elements/m-p/376046#M325</guid>
      <dc:creator>bimdo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-19T22:56:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

