<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Hotlinks Breaking in Project data &amp; BIM</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Hotlinks-Breaking/m-p/294284#M5396</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I think if you kept copying the hotlink you placed, someone might have accidentally copied it as native elements.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If "Suspend Groups" is OFF, and you select a hotlink module and copy it, you will be able to copy it as a hotlink. But if "Suspend Groups" is ON when you copy, it will copy each element as individuals, and not as a hotlink. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You can try selecting the whole hotlink module with Suspend Groups OFF, then turn it ON, and copy. This way when you paste, the elements won't be associated with each other (and the original hotlink) anymore. On the other hand, if you copy with suspend groups OFF, but paste with Suspend Groups ON, it will be fine (so what matters is the state of "Suspend Groups" when you copy).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I think this is what might have happened.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Kovacs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-20T13:50:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hotlinks Breaking</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Hotlinks-Breaking/m-p/294283#M5395</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have just found in one of my models that the majority of hotlinks have become embedded into the host file. It is a multi story building in which the modules were inserted into one story, then copied onto the other stories that have the same layout. In some locations, the stack of modules are good, in others only one story is still linked...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Has anyone run into this before? Maybe know the cause?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ling.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 16:29:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Hotlinks-Breaking/m-p/294283#M5395</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-25T16:29:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hotlinks Breaking</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Hotlinks-Breaking/m-p/294284#M5396</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I think if you kept copying the hotlink you placed, someone might have accidentally copied it as native elements.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If "Suspend Groups" is OFF, and you select a hotlink module and copy it, you will be able to copy it as a hotlink. But if "Suspend Groups" is ON when you copy, it will copy each element as individuals, and not as a hotlink. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You can try selecting the whole hotlink module with Suspend Groups OFF, then turn it ON, and copy. This way when you paste, the elements won't be associated with each other (and the original hotlink) anymore. On the other hand, if you copy with suspend groups OFF, but paste with Suspend Groups ON, it will be fine (so what matters is the state of "Suspend Groups" when you copy).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I think this is what might have happened.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Hotlinks-Breaking/m-p/294284#M5396</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Kovacs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-20T13:50:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hotlinks Breaking</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Hotlinks-Breaking/m-p/294285#M5397</link>
      <description>Right. That would explain the randomness of the broken modules. Good the know.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ling.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 03:48:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/Hotlinks-Breaking/m-p/294285#M5397</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-22T03:48:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

