<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: One hotlink MOD or Many?? in Project data &amp; BIM</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573377#M9744</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I wonder if perhaps you would be better off saving the 3D DWG files as library parts. I'm not sure what kind of model/information they hold.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 08:33:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Erwin Edel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-31T08:33:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>One hotlink MOD or Many??</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/572869#M9721</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;From an overhead point of view in a Teamwork project, is it better to have one large hotlink.mod attached to a project or 5 little ones?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:24:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/572869#M9721</guid>
      <dc:creator>gdford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-18T00:24:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One hotlink MOD or Many??</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/572930#M9727</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5945"&gt;@gdford&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From our experience it depends on the complexity of the project and how many hotlink "steps" you need.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Things like SEO starts to bug out after a few hotlink-steps so depending on how and what you are modeling this also needs to be considered.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We do a lot of multi storey residential and often have several MOD-files and it doesn't seem to make a huge difference whether they are separated or individual.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What does make a difference is if you haven't hacked your registry to allow the MOD-file export to truncate the classification structure.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/572930#M9727</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik Bjornhage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-27T08:08:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One hotlink MOD or Many??</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573023#M9735</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Erik - you just by-passed my pay grade about hacking my registry?&lt;BR /&gt;I did a quick google search and came up with nothing on this...&lt;BR /&gt;Could you give me a bit more detail on what this means?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;FYI none of the hotlinks are bringing in a nested hotlink and none of the hotlinks have any classifications or custom properties.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many of the hotlinks are MOD files composed of 3D dwg models.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2023 13:10:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573023#M9735</guid>
      <dc:creator>gdford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-28T13:10:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One hotlink MOD or Many??</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573152#M9738</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;LOL,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is a bug since AC25 that exports the entire classification tree instead of just the classifications used in the project.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is a registry edit that you can do that resets this to before the bug was born and it's not particularly difficult. Oh wait - it's not a bug - it's a feature.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Found a post (possibly the original) that talks about htis:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/MOD-File-Sized-in-AC25/m-p/321701" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/MOD-File-Sized-in-AC25/m-p/321701&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Like Stuart we did extensive testing to see how it affected our works flow.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think trainwreck would be a good way to describe it - before it got really bad.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There have been indications from GSHQ that this is one the "soon to be fixed"-list - so we'll see.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In our office all users are instructed to run a reg-file after each Archicad update. Takes a few second and no more issues.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:54:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573152#M9738</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik Bjornhage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-30T07:54:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One hotlink MOD or Many??</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573206#M9740</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well I guess that explains the mixing of classifications I had a year ago coming in from hotlinks. I am not setting or using any classifications or custom properties from elements coming in from the hotlink modules... so I removed all of the classifications and properties in all of the pln files that are used to generate the MOD files that we hotlink in.&amp;nbsp; Do you suppose this is another way to fix the issue or do you think I am still getting some overhead from this problem?&lt;BR /&gt;I guess this prompts another possible issue - does having no classification tied to an object give archicad a fit??&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:44:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573206#M9740</guid>
      <dc:creator>gdford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-30T12:44:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One hotlink MOD or Many??</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573376#M9743</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5945"&gt;@gdford&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Well I guess that explains the mixing of classifications I had a year ago coming in from hotlinks. I am not setting or using any classifications or custom properties from elements coming in from the hotlink modules... so I removed all of the classifications and properties in all of the pln files that are used to generate the MOD files that we hotlink in.&amp;nbsp; Do you suppose this is another way to fix the issue or do you think I am still getting some overhead from this problem?&lt;BR /&gt;I guess this prompts another possible issue - does having no classification tied to an object give archicad a fit??&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will start from the bottom up:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Having no classifications won't give AC a fit - but it will mess up your IFC-exports. Also, depending on how tied you are to the tool compared to the function, classificatins are your best friend. If you model a grid ceiling with the Slab Tool - is it a slab - or is it a ceiling?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Secondly - having olde classifications systems coming in from MODs is annoying but reasonably quick to fix (and worth the time/effort) - and I woud always classify objects in their original location (original PLN) so that the Classification follows through and can export properly from your Main Model. I am of course basing this on how we work in our office, where correct IFC-exports are paramount for all our projects.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Even if you don't use IFC it can still be valuable to get e structured work flow around classifications as they are more powerful when it comes to scheduling and working out quantities.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as I know there is currently no other way to fix this MOD-size issue than a RegistryHack but I'm fairly certain there is work being done behind the scenes so it's a waiting game.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 08:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573376#M9743</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik Bjornhage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-31T08:29:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One hotlink MOD or Many??</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573377#M9744</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I wonder if perhaps you would be better off saving the 3D DWG files as library parts. I'm not sure what kind of model/information they hold.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 08:33:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573377#M9744</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erwin Edel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-31T08:33:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One hotlink MOD or Many??</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573587#M9747</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Erwin - most of the my hotlinks are multi-element layer dependant items, but a few I could/and will give that a good testing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 19:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573587#M9747</guid>
      <dc:creator>gdford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-01T19:13:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One hotlink MOD or Many??</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573588#M9748</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Erik,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this project I am doing no IFC exports. I am using classifications in the Main Project, but nothing that comes in from my hotlink MODs in this project needs to be classified. I agree classifications are your best friend as well as custom properties. I am curious - does this registryhack&amp;nbsp; issue extend to apple equipment. I use windows, but some folks on this team are using apple.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 19:20:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573588#M9748</guid>
      <dc:creator>gdford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-01T19:20:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One hotlink MOD or Many??</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573912#M9749</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My only experience with apples is that they have worms in them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have no idea about the Registry issue - I would think that there is something similar but you would have to ask someone who uses Macs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 09:08:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Project-data-BIM/One-hotlink-MOD-or-Many/m-p/573912#M9749</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik Bjornhage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-03T09:08:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

