<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: If VectorWorks gets this, will Graphiosft?!?!?!?!?! in BIMx</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/BIMx/Re-If-VectorWorks-gets-this-will-Graphiosft/m-p/4054#M1360</link>
    <description>While VectorWorks has quite a few things worth copying and has become a decent boolean and now NURBS modeler, it's not in the same league as ArchiCAD in terms of Building Information Modeling. So if you want to model furniture, as I used to do in VectorWorks, it's great. But if you need to produce CDs for a high end residence you're better off with AutoCad, and much better off with ArchiCAD. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But the issue here is not so much bang for the buck or how good or not VectorWorks itself is. Rather it's the fact that a moderately priced CAD package can have a better rendering engine than a high-end BIM application. They do because they simply bought it, just like formZ, Ashlar Cobalt, ProE...</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2003 02:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SeaGeoff</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-12-06T02:16:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re: If VectorWorks gets this, will Graphiosft?!?!?!?!?!</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/BIMx/Re-If-VectorWorks-gets-this-will-Graphiosft/m-p/4054#M1360</link>
      <description>While VectorWorks has quite a few things worth copying and has become a decent boolean and now NURBS modeler, it's not in the same league as ArchiCAD in terms of Building Information Modeling. So if you want to model furniture, as I used to do in VectorWorks, it's great. But if you need to produce CDs for a high end residence you're better off with AutoCad, and much better off with ArchiCAD. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But the issue here is not so much bang for the buck or how good or not VectorWorks itself is. Rather it's the fact that a moderately priced CAD package can have a better rendering engine than a high-end BIM application. They do because they simply bought it, just like formZ, Ashlar Cobalt, ProE...</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2003 02:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/BIMx/Re-If-VectorWorks-gets-this-will-Graphiosft/m-p/4054#M1360</guid>
      <dc:creator>SeaGeoff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-06T02:16:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

