topic Re: After the wallhole, the frame is odd in section. in GDL

After the wallhole, the frame is odd in section.

LeeJaeYoung — Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:25:17 GMT

It's the same cross section.
However, it is expressed differently. (It feels blocked by something.)
And this happens even if status is set to 1.
What's the matter?

However, if you cut only the frame, it is normal as shown below.

material "air"

Re: After the wallhole, the frame is odd in section.

SenecaDesignLLC — Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:19:47 GMT

Wall skins parameters change sides/direction/ numbering in gdl when the wall is flipped or mirrored

Re: After the wallhole, the frame is odd in section.

LeeJaeYoung — Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:27:35 GMT

this is plan view

The difference between the two walls is wall flip.

What should I do?

Re: After the wallhole, the frame is odd in section.

Jochen Suehlo — Mon, 20 Mar 2023 18:22:00 GMT

In my window I use the following code in the MAster Script:

! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ! ! S C H I C H T E N ! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ! ski_no = WALL_SKINS_NUMBER IF ski_no = 0 THEN ski_no = 3 DIM wand_fill[], wand_fill_pen[], wand_back_pen[], wand_kontur_pen[], wand_thck[], wand_cont_pen_unten[], wand_mat[] DIM wand_linetype_unten[], wand_material[], wand_bm[], wand_struktur[] ! ac_wall_direction_type integer ! wall direction type; ! the construction method of the wall, which means the adjustment of the wall body and the reference line: ! 0 – Right, 1 – Left, 2 – Center (Right), 3 – Center (Left). ! Center values mean that the wall is set to ‘Center’ in the user interface, but the side notation shows how the wall acts internally IF (ac_wall_direction_type = 1 OR ac_wall_direction_type = 3 ) THEN !OR \ !( ac_wall_direction_type = 3 AND (W~ = 180)) THEN FOR i = 1 TO ski_no wand_fill[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[i][1] wand_fill_pen[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[i][4] wand_back_pen[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[i][5] wand_struktur[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[i][6] wand_kontur_pen[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[i][9] wand_linetype_unten[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[i][8] wand_cont_pen_unten[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[i][7] wand_thck[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[i][2] wand_mat[i] = WALL_SKINS_BMAT_NAMES[i][1] wand_material[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[i][13] wand_bm[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[i][18] NEXT i ENDIF IF (ac_wall_direction_type = 0 OR ac_wall_direction_type = 2) THEN !OR \ !( ac_wall_direction_type = 1 AND (W~ = 0)) OR \ !( ac_wall_direction_type = 0 AND (W~ = 180)) OR \ !( ac_wall_direction_type = 2 AND (W~ = 180)) THEN FOR i = 1 TO ski_no wand_fill[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[ski_no + 1 - i][1] wand_fill_pen[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[ski_no + 1 - i][4] wand_back_pen[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[ski_no + 1 - i][5] wand_struktur[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[ski_no + 1 - i][6] wand_kontur_pen[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[ski_no + 1 - i][9] wand_linetype_unten[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[ski_no + 1 - i][8] wand_cont_pen_unten[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[ski_no + 1 - i][7] wand_thck[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[ski_no + 1 - i][2] wand_mat[i] = WALL_SKINS_BMAT_NAMES[ski_no + 1 - i][1] wand_material[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[ski_no + 1 - i][13] wand_bm[i] = WALL_SKINS_PARAMS[ski_no + 1 - i][18] NEXT i ENDIF

Re: After the wallhole, the frame is odd in section.

LeeJaeYoung — Tue, 21 Mar 2023 01:54:01 GMT

ah! thank you
You use this in your master script.
I thought I had to use wall_skins_param for 2d and 3d scripts respectively.
Was it like that in practice?

But what I want to ask is that the door is installed on the same wall, but only on the other wall, toward the structure. This is a question about how to solve the phenomenon that half of the frame line is covered by the wall fill.
If you look closely, after using the wallhole, the phenomenon that half of the frame made with prism_ is covered by the wallhole fill only occurs on the left side.
I was asking how to solve this.
The source code is studying the door dimension example ac19.gsm file.

Re: After the wallhole, the frame is odd in section.

LeeJaeYoung — Tue, 21 Mar 2023 04:51:51 GMT

I don't know what went wrong either.
The solution is to delete the section and create a new section.
The phenomenon that the door frame on the right side overlaps the fill of the wallhole has disappeared.

I think the cross section is a bug in my judgment.

thank you so much