<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Basics, orphans, productivity loss &amp;amp; 'low hanging fruit'? in Libraries &amp; objects</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Basics-orphans-productivity-loss-amp-low-hanging-fruit/m-p/134514#M19109</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Recently searching for what I consider a 'staple' object eg. a stacked washer dryer as typically found in many residential applications including condos I had to forage back to my v7 library.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Of course this won't help anyone who isn't a long time user...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I continue to experience what I consider a surprising &amp;amp; critical lack of library consistency &amp;amp; focus in this software - isn't this the heart of BIM ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Critics suggest library management is 'easy' ? Debatable perhaps, but certainly not efficient.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
From my perspective hunting down orphaned objects, migrating them one by one, checking/aligning attributes, favourites &amp;amp; frequently needing to re-enter the entire BIM parametric supplier data is a tedious, exhaustive, error prone &amp;amp; fundamentally undermining exercise.  Graphisoft CREATES this needless burden &amp;amp; problem...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What good are 4 cores if I am spending a large % of time fiddling with GDL objects?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Items in this category for me include: dining room table, quarter sphere wall sconce, exterior chaise lounge, stacked washer dryer, ceiling fans (ironic w/ecodesigner offered), changed/lost kitchen cabinetry, numerous chairs (some duplicates), many simple stairs that worked better than the stairmaker options ever have - I could go on...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
From my perspective an entire bugfix could consist of / focus on library migration/enhancement eg. no more feature upgrades added to already debatably complex software - until what is there works more efficaciously ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I suggest this is essential &amp;amp; far better done globally at source (GS) with each 'upgrade' rather than simply abandoning so many basic objects leaving the millions of users to fend for themselves...?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/17118i68E6A5A8EEA35258/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="washer-dryer.jpg" title="washer-dryer.jpg" /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:24:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>March_ Bruce</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-18T15:24:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Basics, orphans, productivity loss &amp; 'low hanging fruit'?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Basics-orphans-productivity-loss-amp-low-hanging-fruit/m-p/134514#M19109</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Recently searching for what I consider a 'staple' object eg. a stacked washer dryer as typically found in many residential applications including condos I had to forage back to my v7 library.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Of course this won't help anyone who isn't a long time user...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I continue to experience what I consider a surprising &amp;amp; critical lack of library consistency &amp;amp; focus in this software - isn't this the heart of BIM ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Critics suggest library management is 'easy' ? Debatable perhaps, but certainly not efficient.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
From my perspective hunting down orphaned objects, migrating them one by one, checking/aligning attributes, favourites &amp;amp; frequently needing to re-enter the entire BIM parametric supplier data is a tedious, exhaustive, error prone &amp;amp; fundamentally undermining exercise.  Graphisoft CREATES this needless burden &amp;amp; problem...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What good are 4 cores if I am spending a large % of time fiddling with GDL objects?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Items in this category for me include: dining room table, quarter sphere wall sconce, exterior chaise lounge, stacked washer dryer, ceiling fans (ironic w/ecodesigner offered), changed/lost kitchen cabinetry, numerous chairs (some duplicates), many simple stairs that worked better than the stairmaker options ever have - I could go on...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
From my perspective an entire bugfix could consist of / focus on library migration/enhancement eg. no more feature upgrades added to already debatably complex software - until what is there works more efficaciously ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I suggest this is essential &amp;amp; far better done globally at source (GS) with each 'upgrade' rather than simply abandoning so many basic objects leaving the millions of users to fend for themselves...?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/17118i68E6A5A8EEA35258/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="washer-dryer.jpg" title="washer-dryer.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:24:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Basics-orphans-productivity-loss-amp-low-hanging-fruit/m-p/134514#M19109</guid>
      <dc:creator>March_ Bruce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-18T15:24:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basics, orphans, productivity loss &amp; 'low hanging fr</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Basics-orphans-productivity-loss-amp-low-hanging-fruit/m-p/134515#M19110</link>
      <description>The irony of this horrible and ongoing problem is that the fix is so simple. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It doesn't require the complex coding knowledge the Archicad programming team possesses, but merely diligent clerking with some GDL knowledge. And the will to make it happen.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:03:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Basics-orphans-productivity-loss-amp-low-hanging-fruit/m-p/134515#M19110</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-18T16:03:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basics, orphans, productivity loss &amp; 'low hanging fr</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Basics-orphans-productivity-loss-amp-low-hanging-fruit/m-p/134516#M19111</link>
      <description>I gather from dialogue at the support level that you are indeed correct - presumably largely an issue of 'culture' at the senior management level - eg the will to make it happen...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Library localization may also be a logistical burden at the development level, as I gather many great objects from other areas never make it to North America? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I keep asking if a more graphical interface might assist with a more 'universal' library object development ?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:14:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Basics-orphans-productivity-loss-amp-low-hanging-fruit/m-p/134516#M19111</guid>
      <dc:creator>March_ Bruce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-18T16:14:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basics, orphans, productivity loss &amp; 'low hanging fr</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Basics-orphans-productivity-loss-amp-low-hanging-fruit/m-p/134517#M19112</link>
      <description>So they don't care since buyers discover the bad library AFTER the purchase completes.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:54:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Basics-orphans-productivity-loss-amp-low-hanging-fruit/m-p/134517#M19112</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-18T17:54:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basics, orphans, productivity loss &amp; 'low hanging fr</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Basics-orphans-productivity-loss-amp-low-hanging-fruit/m-p/134518#M19113</link>
      <description>I've posted on this in other threads, and I agree that the state of libraries is a disaster. Here in Australia the localized library still has not been upgraded to 14. &lt;BR /&gt;
GUI might help but the different versions for each release that's a huge disaster. &lt;BR /&gt;
Ironic also that for years GS was talking about manufacturers and GDL parts. Revit parts are a dime a dozen but GDL based ones nowhere to be seen. &lt;BR /&gt;
Finally they should employ true database power and have multiple tags so that there are numerous was to slice and dice to find parts. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Oh and while I am at it, the way a BIM server library requires a whole folder to be refreshed when updating a part is a pain. Embed the part, I hear you say- but that is not helpful for a large project where the part needs to be used across numerous files. And why must libraries on the BIM server be maintained from ArchiCAD? on the BIM server a spare copy of AC must be available to do such actions...and there is another topic - the strange demarkation of server management between the server client and AC itself...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:32:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Basics-orphans-productivity-loss-amp-low-hanging-fruit/m-p/134518#M19113</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-18T20:32:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

