<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BIM Content Needs Survey in Libraries &amp; objects</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126115#M24710</link>
    <description>Done</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:25:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-04-30T04:25:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BIM Content Needs Survey</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126107#M24702</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;McGraw Hill Construction is promoting a survey on the BIM(VB) users opinion concerning the lack of good building product models.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I would strongly recommend all ArchiCad users to go over there and spend 5 minutes on it. I think it is important that building product manufacturers don´t get cornered into doing products just for one software.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=mCpjNgj0KlAIyrpcHqmzDg_3d_3d" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm= ... mzDg_3d_3d"&gt;https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=mCpjNgj0KlAIyrpcHqmzDg_3d_3d&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:42:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126107#M24702</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-29T09:42:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM Content Needs Survey</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126108#M24703</link>
      <description>Done. Only 17 questions so doesn't take very long.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Interesting survey. I wonder if they will listen?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I did make a point at the end about perhaps hassling the BIM software makers for better interoperability, so perhaps eventually it would be possible to use one intelligent object in &lt;U&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/S&gt;any&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; BIM software, rather than devote resources to create individual objects specific to each software. Preferably this should be in an open format, so no-one can 'own' it. (How about .bim?!)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
There is nothing more annoying to find there is a revit object available but no GDL object!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for pointing it out, Miguel!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126108#M24703</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-29T14:32:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM Content Needs Survey</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126109#M24704</link>
      <description>Thanks for pointing this out Miguel. It is a very important subject. &lt;BR /&gt;
I completed the questionnaire.&lt;BR /&gt;
I agree with Peter's comments.&lt;BR /&gt;
IFC and Interoperability.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:18:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126109#M24704</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erika Epstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-29T17:18:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM Content Needs Survey</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126110#M24705</link>
      <description>done .. its up to AC users to make sure BIM does not just default to Autodesk like 2D CAD did</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:24:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126110#M24705</guid>
      <dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-29T17:24:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM Content Needs Survey</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126111#M24706</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;owen wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;done .. its up to AC users to make sure BIM does not just default to Autodesk like 2D CAD did&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I couldn't agree more and filled out the survey to reflect that in the appropriate places.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for letting us know about this survey.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:04:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126111#M24706</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-29T21:04:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM Content Needs Survey</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126112#M24707</link>
      <description>done..&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
a little too long x me &lt;E&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/E&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:29:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126112#M24707</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rakela Raul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-29T22:29:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM Content Needs Survey</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126113#M24708</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;owen wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;done .. its up to AC users to make sure BIM does not just default to Autodesk like 2D CAD did&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
Couldn't agree more. We've been working and talking manufacturers into BIM integration for a while now. However in the last 6 months we've noticed Autodesk has really turned up their marketing machine. I'm based in NZ (where AC has far more users than revit). But sadly a lot of manufacturers have heard of Revit content but not AC. They all have dwgs so they think Revit is just the next step/upgrade.&lt;BR /&gt;
So yeah, it's up to all of us AC users to make sure we get the content we need and don't end up in a world of Revit families.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126113#M24708</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-30T00:33:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM Content Needs Survey</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126114#M24709</link>
      <description>Krippahl,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for pointing out the survey. Hopefully we will all be heard over the Revit noise.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:33:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126114#M24709</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-30T01:33:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM Content Needs Survey</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126115#M24710</link>
      <description>Done</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:25:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/BIM-Content-Needs-Survey/m-p/126115#M24710</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-30T04:25:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

