<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Best practice -libraries in Libraries &amp; objects</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Best-practice-libraries/m-p/146034#M25518</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;We are looking for a suggestion to a best practice of library handling.&lt;BR /&gt;
The situation: &lt;BR /&gt;
During the progress of the work library parts from different places are placed in the project. Library parts origin from AC, local libraries(lcf) and a number of loose parts found on different places on the Web, on employees cds in the bottom of drawers and so on.&lt;BR /&gt;
Some of the parts have to be imported and loaded in AC since they either come from lcfs or have to be loaded to be evaluated . &lt;BR /&gt;
The problem.&lt;BR /&gt;
After some weeks a huge number of dublicates are loaded since a number of the parts have same GUIDs ore use the same textures. &lt;BR /&gt;
In addition the above mentioned cd is on vacation causing missing library parts.&lt;BR /&gt;
The solution?&lt;BR /&gt;
It is possible to save as archive and then extract the library into the project library. The solution requires huge resources and some amount of manual file handling.&lt;BR /&gt;
Any suggestions?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-30T08:46:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best practice -libraries</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Best-practice-libraries/m-p/146034#M25518</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;We are looking for a suggestion to a best practice of library handling.&lt;BR /&gt;
The situation: &lt;BR /&gt;
During the progress of the work library parts from different places are placed in the project. Library parts origin from AC, local libraries(lcf) and a number of loose parts found on different places on the Web, on employees cds in the bottom of drawers and so on.&lt;BR /&gt;
Some of the parts have to be imported and loaded in AC since they either come from lcfs or have to be loaded to be evaluated . &lt;BR /&gt;
The problem.&lt;BR /&gt;
After some weeks a huge number of dublicates are loaded since a number of the parts have same GUIDs ore use the same textures. &lt;BR /&gt;
In addition the above mentioned cd is on vacation causing missing library parts.&lt;BR /&gt;
The solution?&lt;BR /&gt;
It is possible to save as archive and then extract the library into the project library. The solution requires huge resources and some amount of manual file handling.&lt;BR /&gt;
Any suggestions?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Best-practice-libraries/m-p/146034#M25518</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-30T08:46:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best practice -libraries</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Best-practice-libraries/m-p/146035#M25519</link>
      <description>hvid,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am afraid that you will have to go through the manual process. Another bad news is when you saved/extracted an archive file some macros or attached (referred in the script) images won't be picked up... and that's a pain. So make yourself a big mug of coffee, breath in deeply and get it nailed....&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
organisation of libs.&lt;BR /&gt;
what we do here is:&lt;BR /&gt;
1. we keep all default (*.lcf, GS Traffic etc) on the server and everyone uses those (maintenance is the obvious advantage)&lt;BR /&gt;
2. Any custom or downloaded lib parts go to the specific job folder so this way you have all bits and pieces nicely together.&lt;BR /&gt;
3. in general adding downloaded lib parts is strictly limited to a project architect or cad manager approval.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:42:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Best-practice-libraries/m-p/146035#M25519</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-30T21:42:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best practice -libraries</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Best-practice-libraries/m-p/146036#M25520</link>
      <description>Hi rob&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for the reply.&lt;BR /&gt;
1.Sure its a good practice to keep lcfs and GS libs on the server&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
2.Great practice as well. The problem is as you mention yourself the risc of loosing macros and connected textures and probs.&lt;BR /&gt;
Also there is a great risc of boosting your number of materials sice the only way of picking a single element out of a factory lib is to download, extract and load the entire library. The problem is -of course- most significant in the early stages of the project hunting down different lib parts used for visualizing.&lt;BR /&gt;
In some cases we invent a specific "download, extract and pick- model" only to make sure not to drown the project in properties.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
3. Wouldn´t it be nice!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
hvid</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:59:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Best-practice-libraries/m-p/146036#M25520</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T12:59:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best practice -libraries</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Best-practice-libraries/m-p/146037#M25521</link>
      <description>AFAIK GS is working on some kind of lib part and libraries consolidation in regards to migrating. They are fully aware of GDL-linked macro/images etc shortcomings.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:29:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Best-practice-libraries/m-p/146037#M25521</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-02T00:29:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best practice -libraries</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Best-practice-libraries/m-p/146038#M25522</link>
      <description>4. The office library - the parts that are used in all the projects but not found in the standard library - that is also ideally handled by the BIM manager only</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 04:36:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Best-practice-libraries/m-p/146038#M25522</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-04T04:36:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

