<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: error on boolean operation on AC10 but not in AC9 in Libraries &amp; objects</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/error-on-boolean-operation-on-AC10-but-not-in-AC9/m-p/56669#M30664</link>
    <description>Hi Yohann!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I did run into some differences in the handling of the GROUP (solid ops) functions between 9 and 10, but they were pretty easily sorted. It has to do with the strangeness of calling groups by their name (in quotations) vs. calling the results of operations as variables (without the quotation marks). At least as I recall. If you can post the code I can give a more detailed response.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 15:22:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-25T15:22:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>error on boolean operation on AC10 but not in AC9</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/error-on-boolean-operation-on-AC10-but-not-in-AC9/m-p/56667#M30662</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;hello all,   &lt;BR /&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
have you ever heard about an error that occurs in AC10 and not AC9  &lt;BR /&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
I don't understand what is the difference between the two on the GDL point of view...  &lt;BR /&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;
hope you will say me there are differences on limits or something else. Thanks&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 10:23:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/error-on-boolean-operation-on-AC10-but-not-in-AC9/m-p/56667#M30662</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-24T10:23:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: error on boolean operation on AC10 but not in AC9</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/error-on-boolean-operation-on-AC10-but-not-in-AC9/m-p/56668#M30663</link>
      <description>could you be more specific mate?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 10:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/error-on-boolean-operation-on-AC10-but-not-in-AC9/m-p/56668#M30663</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-24T10:53:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: error on boolean operation on AC10 but not in AC9</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/error-on-boolean-operation-on-AC10-but-not-in-AC9/m-p/56669#M30664</link>
      <description>Hi Yohann!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I did run into some differences in the handling of the GROUP (solid ops) functions between 9 and 10, but they were pretty easily sorted. It has to do with the strangeness of calling groups by their name (in quotations) vs. calling the results of operations as variables (without the quotation marks). At least as I recall. If you can post the code I can give a more detailed response.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 15:22:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/error-on-boolean-operation-on-AC10-but-not-in-AC9/m-p/56669#M30664</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-25T15:22:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

