topic Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object in Libraries & objects

!Restored: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Anonymous — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:00:03 GMT

Hi people,

Here is the link for an object I designed and uploaded to the new Object Depository witch is, in my humble opinion, a great advance in the stablishment of a real consistent archicad community. Good job Tibor!

http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/object_depository.php?browse=Depository/15%20Mechanical/Drainage

Some feedback would be very appreciate.

Best Regards,

Braza

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Anonymous — Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:27:38 GMT

Braza,
I have downloaded your library part but I can't get ArchiCAD to recognize it. I can't open it as a library part and it doesn't appear when I load it in my office library. Any thoughts??

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Djordje — Wed, 14 Jun 2006 03:47:59 GMT

gbley wrote:
Braza,
I have downloaded your library part but I can't get ArchiCAD to recognize it. I can't open it as a library part and it doesn't appear when I load it in my office library. Any thoughts??

Mac? Win?

PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR ARCHICAD VERSION AND OS IN THE SIGNATURE

(If only I had one monetary unit for every time I typed this ...)

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Jochen Suehlo — Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:11:42 GMT

Although the ArchiPipe object is named to be made in AC 9 by the author, it only works and can be recognized by ArchiCAD 10.

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Anonymous — Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:03:46 GMT

Mac? Win?

PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR ARCHICAD VERSION AND OS IN THE SIGNATURE

(If only I had one monetary unit for every time I typed this ...)

Djordje,
I do include that information in my signature. Is there additional info I should include? Contact me and I will give you an address where you can send that monetary unit.

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Anonymous — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 02:17:42 GMT

Djordje wrote:
PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR ARCHICAD VERSION AND OS IN THE SIGNATURE

(If only I had one monetary unit for every time I typed this ...)

Djordje, how about making this required info for being a member of this forum. It could be part of the member profile and automatically displayed for each user, and in a consistent format.

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Link — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 02:42:58 GMT

Djordje, how about making this required info for being a member of this forum. It could be part of the member profile and automatically displayed for each user, and in a consistent format.

That's a great idea. It should almost be a mandatory field!

Cheers,
Link.

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Anonymous — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 02:47:32 GMT

It would obviously take away a large portion of Djordje's supplementary income, but hey, it's for the good of the people! 😉

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Thomas Holm — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:16:30 GMT

You mean he's paid per posting?

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Anonymous — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:51:29 GMT

Thomas wrote:
You mean he's paid per posting?

Thomas,

Haven't you been getting your checks? Why do you think Dwight and I post so much?

At one Forint per post it really adds up. When I reach 3000 I'm going to blow it all on lunch at the mexican place across the street.

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Rakela Raul — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:29:25 GMT

Djordje, how about making this required info for being a member of this forum. It could be part of the member profile and automatically displayed for each user, and in a consistent format

i would even make this "tip of the month"

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Dwight — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:36:28 GMT

Dang.
I didn't charge enough.
They pay me in Threeints.

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Anonymous — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:32:09 GMT

gbley wrote:
Braza,
I have downloaded your library part but I can't get ArchiCAD to recognize it. I can't open it as a library part and it doesn't appear when I load it in my office library. Any thoughts??

Hi gbley,

Sorry for the delay in answer your question... As Djordje & Co. said it's because it was made in AC10... I'll provide a new file for AC9 as soon as possible.

Thank you for the feedback,

Braza

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

TomWaltz — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:03:35 GMT

Matthew wrote:
Thomas wrote:
You mean he's paid per posting?
Thomas,

Haven't you been getting your checks? Why do you think Dwight and I post so much?

Matthew, SSSHHHHH!! GS was trying to cut him out of the loop!

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Thomas Holm — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:14:30 GMT

Matthew wrote:
Haven't you been getting your checks? Why do you think Dwight and I post so much?

I just thought you were about four times as crazy as I!

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Anonymous — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:03:44 GMT

Thomas wrote:
I just thought you were about four times as crazy as I!

Thomas,

It's a good point... Maybe your income can be increased by 4!

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Anonymous — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:19:42 GMT

Thomas wrote:
You mean he's paid per posting?

No, he's paid for every time he has to tell someone to put sysinfo in their signature. 😉

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Anonymous — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:19:10 GMT

Hi there,

I've just uploaded to the object depository the 2 versions of the object ArchiPIPE 1.1 (AC9/AC10).
Sorry for the mess.

Braza

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Thomas Holm — Sat, 17 Jun 2006 08:31:37 GMT

Braza wrote:
Thomas wrote:
It's a good point... Maybe your income can be increased by 4!

Yes... By Four ints, that is.... (not worth much these days - Hungary uses the Euro now, don't they?)

Re: ArchiPIPE 1.1 object

Djordje — Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:12:30 GMT

Thomas wrote:
Yes... By Four ints, that is.... (not worth much these days - Hungary uses the Euro now, don't they?)

Last time I was there (a year ago) Forints were still strong and official.