topic Re: FPRISM and Status Codes in Libraries & objects

FPRISM and Status Codes

TomWaltz — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:35:52 GMT

Can anyone tell me why this

			FPRISM_ endMatl, endMatl, endMatl, endMatl, 
				5, offsetDist1, 45,offsetDist1, 
					0, 0, 15,
					0, ZZYZX,  15,
					-B, ZZYZX, 15,
					-B, 0, 15,
					0, 0, 15

is missing an edge?

Re: FPRISM and Status Codes

Anonymous — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:41:05 GMT

Hello Tom,

definitively BUG!

I checked for angle parameter of FPrism_ & discovered that when you replace 45 (yours) with some other values contour line appears. But after some more plays with this mystery, have find solution for all values: "generate 3D model & after press CTRL+SHIFT+R from Keyboard" - missed line appears.

note: Test done for 3D view modes with both Internal & OpelGL engines

Re: FPRISM and Status Codes

Anonymous — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:53:49 GMT

Another interesting thing is that at 1st you don't see lines in 3D-Axo preview (ObjMakingDialog). But if you switch to shade mode and switch back to hidden mode line appears!

Re: FPRISM and Status Codes

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:08:40 GMT

The status code to close the prism should be "-1"

FPRISM_ endMatl, endMatl, endMatl, endMatl,
5, offsetDist1, 45,offsetDist1,
0, 0, 15,
0, ZZYZX, 15,
-B, ZZYZX, 15,
-B, 0, 15,
0, 0, -1

Re: FPRISM and Status Codes

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:51:39 GMT

shaun wrote:
The status code to close the prism should be "-1"

No, status code value -1 doesn't close main prism contours, it is used for holes!
See below.

GDL wrote:

si=-1 is used to define holes directly into the prism. It marks the end of the contour and the beginning of a hole inside of the contour. It is also used to indicate the end of one hole's contour and the beginning of another. Coordinates before that value must be identical to the coordinates of the first point of the contour/hole. If you have used the -1 mask value, the last mask value in the parameter list must be -1, marking the end of the last hole.

Re: FPRISM and Status Codes

Vitruvius — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:00:04 GMT

I think the problem lies in line 2 of your code -

...
n, thickness, angle, hill_height,
...

You have assigned Offsetdist1 to both thickness & hill_height but hill_height < thickness. Try reducing the hill_height and your edge should reappear.

Cheers

Re: FPRISM and Status Codes

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:02:15 GMT

Vitruvius wrote:
You have assigned Offsetdist1 to both thickness & hill_height but hill_height < thickness. Try reducing the hill_height and your edge should reappear.
Cheers

You found the bug.
Hill_heigth=thickness and because of overlaping some times they are shown or not. And that's why Ctrl+Shift+R corrects "error".

Re: FPRISM and Status Codes

Laszlo Nagy — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:48:08 GMT

Z.Bauer wrote:
shaun wrote:
The status code to close the prism should be "-1"
No, status code value -1 doesn't close main prism contours, it is used for holes!
See below.

GDL wrote:

si=-1 is used to define holes directly into the prism. It marks the end of the contour and the beginning of a hole inside of the contour. It is also used to indicate the end of one hole's contour and the beginning of another. Coordinates before that value must be identical to the coordinates of the first point of the contour/hole. If you have used the -1 mask value, the last mask value in the parameter list must be -1, marking the end of the last hole.

The use of "-1" is correct, I think.
I mean, it might be different from what the manual says, but it still works.
You can use it like that - even if no hole is defined after the -1 status code.
Or you can leave the last line, meaning the FPRISM will have 4 nodes, and ArchiCAD will automatically close the polygon.

Still, the missing edge could be a bug.

Re: FPRISM and Status Codes

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:57:39 GMT

laszlonagy wrote:
The use of "-1" is correct, I think.
I mean, it might be different from what the manual says, but it still works.
Still, the missing edge could be a bug.

Is using of "-1", in context of this topic, really works by you (I'm not meaning that it can be used without holes)? Beacause by me no difference!

Re: FPRISM and Status Codes

TomWaltz — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:06:33 GMT

Z.Bauer wrote:
laszlonagy wrote:
The use of "-1" is correct, I think.
I mean, it might be different from what the manual says, but it still works.
Still, the missing edge could be a bug.
Is using of "-1", in context of this topic, really works by you (I'm not meaning that it can be used without holes)? Beacause by me no difference!

It seems like -1 would be the correct syntax, but 16 yields a correct result more often than -1 did (since with each Rebuild, that last edge seems to disappear or reappear!)

Re: FPRISM and Status Codes

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:07:31 GMT

Z.Bauer wrote:
laszlonagy wrote:
The use of "-1" is correct, I think.
I mean, it might be different from what the manual says, but it still works.
Still, the missing edge could be a bug.
Is using of "-1", in context of this topic, really works by you (I'm not meaning that it can be used without holes)? Beacause by me no difference!

The use of -1 is correct (it marks the end of the contour), though I didn't check that it would solve this problem