<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ArchiFM is dead in Libraries &amp; objects</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/ArchiFM-is-dead/m-p/32094#M35760</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;What are we going to do with now redundant internally defined parameters like FM_something? just thought after reading this:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://go.cadwire.net/?42045,1,211" target="_blank"&gt;http://go.cadwire.net/?42045,1,211&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
related to:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=7760" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/vie ... php?t=7760"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=7760&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Do we need major overhaul of the predefined listing parameters?&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 04:49:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-08-17T04:49:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArchiFM is dead</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/ArchiFM-is-dead/m-p/32094#M35760</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;What are we going to do with now redundant internally defined parameters like FM_something? just thought after reading this:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://go.cadwire.net/?42045,1,211" target="_blank"&gt;http://go.cadwire.net/?42045,1,211&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
related to:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=7760" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/vie ... php?t=7760"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=7760&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Do we need major overhaul of the predefined listing parameters?&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 04:49:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/ArchiFM-is-dead/m-p/32094#M35760</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-17T04:49:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiFM is dead</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/ArchiFM-is-dead/m-p/32095#M35761</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Rob wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Do we need major overhaul of the predefined listing parameters?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
depends - sounds like &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;somebody&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; will be taking over FM . . . and i'm sure the archiCAD integration would have to be as tight simply for them to be able to promote it in their early years . . .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
my thoughts: change them all to &lt;B&gt;ifc_something&lt;/B&gt; anyway . . .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
~/archiben</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 05:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/ArchiFM-is-dead/m-p/32095#M35761</guid>
      <dc:creator>__archiben</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-08-17T05:33:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

