<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic REPAIR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PRISM_ in Libraries &amp; objects</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/REPAIR-THE-IMPLEMENTATION-OF-PRISM/m-p/16781#M37902</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;
For the longest time I have noticed that, in the 3D window, many&lt;BR /&gt;
objects when placed next to each other lose the common edge lines&lt;BR /&gt;
at the joint between them. I always assumed that there was something&lt;BR /&gt;
wrong with my machine, but recently I discovered that this issue has&lt;BR /&gt;
been known and reported for at least six months.&lt;BR /&gt;
see this thread :&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=23897&amp;amp;highlight=prism&amp;amp;sid=c57831d1d6537ea64a7ae9f67c0ba5a3#23897" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/vie ... a5a3#23897"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=23897&amp;amp;highlight=prism&amp;amp;sid=c57831d1d6537ea64a7ae9f67c0ba5a3#23897&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I did some testing and concluded that the mostly the problem occurs&lt;BR /&gt;
with various forms of the PRISM command. But it also occurs with&lt;BR /&gt;
the tube command when the path is closed.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I did a search in the wishes forum and found no wish that mentioned&lt;BR /&gt;
the problem of the implementation of the PRISM_ command&lt;BR /&gt;
in AC 8.1 and AC 9.0 build 1964.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I understand that there are many work-arounds including converting&lt;BR /&gt;
all PRISM_ commands to EXTRUDE but in many cases this is not &lt;BR /&gt;
satisfactory because the mask and status values of EXTRUDE&lt;BR /&gt;
are limited relative to PRISM_ .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But why do we have to do work-arounds ?&lt;BR /&gt;
PRISM_ has always been the true workhorse of GDL.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have entered a wish for the repair of the implementation of PRISM_ .&lt;BR /&gt;
It is at the top of the list chronologically in Open Archicad Wishes.&lt;BR /&gt;
Please vote.&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you,&lt;BR /&gt;
Peter Devlin&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 10:11:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-24T10:11:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>REPAIR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PRISM_</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/REPAIR-THE-IMPLEMENTATION-OF-PRISM/m-p/16781#M37902</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;
For the longest time I have noticed that, in the 3D window, many&lt;BR /&gt;
objects when placed next to each other lose the common edge lines&lt;BR /&gt;
at the joint between them. I always assumed that there was something&lt;BR /&gt;
wrong with my machine, but recently I discovered that this issue has&lt;BR /&gt;
been known and reported for at least six months.&lt;BR /&gt;
see this thread :&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=23897&amp;amp;highlight=prism&amp;amp;sid=c57831d1d6537ea64a7ae9f67c0ba5a3#23897" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/vie ... a5a3#23897"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=23897&amp;amp;highlight=prism&amp;amp;sid=c57831d1d6537ea64a7ae9f67c0ba5a3#23897&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I did some testing and concluded that the mostly the problem occurs&lt;BR /&gt;
with various forms of the PRISM command. But it also occurs with&lt;BR /&gt;
the tube command when the path is closed.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I did a search in the wishes forum and found no wish that mentioned&lt;BR /&gt;
the problem of the implementation of the PRISM_ command&lt;BR /&gt;
in AC 8.1 and AC 9.0 build 1964.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I understand that there are many work-arounds including converting&lt;BR /&gt;
all PRISM_ commands to EXTRUDE but in many cases this is not &lt;BR /&gt;
satisfactory because the mask and status values of EXTRUDE&lt;BR /&gt;
are limited relative to PRISM_ .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But why do we have to do work-arounds ?&lt;BR /&gt;
PRISM_ has always been the true workhorse of GDL.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have entered a wish for the repair of the implementation of PRISM_ .&lt;BR /&gt;
It is at the top of the list chronologically in Open Archicad Wishes.&lt;BR /&gt;
Please vote.&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you,&lt;BR /&gt;
Peter Devlin&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 10:11:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/REPAIR-THE-IMPLEMENTATION-OF-PRISM/m-p/16781#M37902</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T10:11:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

