https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/0-or-1-for-first-value-in-a-DIM-array/m-p/64334#M39030 <DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"><R>Often when scripting geometric parts, loops start from 0 and go through to 1 (or 'X'). It is 'frustrating' (and untidy) to have to use a [i <B>+1</B>] throughout the code.<BR /> <BR /> If GDL pretends to be a geometrical scripting language then allowing basic mathematics would be a nice touch.<BR /> <BR /> Note - my personal 'recommendation' would be just for a small extension of the existing coding, thus<BR /> DIM A[8] would allow A[0], A[1], A[2] ... A[8]<BR /> - which would not interfere with legacy code -and- make me happy in the future!<BR /> <BR /> - Stuart<BR /> <BR /> <I></I><S><I><I></I></I></S>PS. Yeah - I know this is a pretty small wish - but surely it would be easier to implement??<E></E></R></DIV> Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:30:19 GMT Anonymous 2004-11-19T15:30:19Z https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/0-or-1-for-first-value-in-a-DIM-array/m-p/64334#M39030 <DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"><R>Often when scripting geometric parts, loops start from 0 and go through to 1 (or 'X'). It is 'frustrating' (and untidy) to have to use a [i <B>+1</B>] throughout the code.<BR /> <BR /> If GDL pretends to be a geometrical scripting language then allowing basic mathematics would be a nice touch.<BR /> <BR /> Note - my personal 'recommendation' would be just for a small extension of the existing coding, thus<BR /> DIM A[8] would allow A[0], A[1], A[2] ... A[8]<BR /> - which would not interfere with legacy code -and- make me happy in the future!<BR /> <BR /> - Stuart<BR /> <BR /> <I></I><S><I><I></I></I></S>PS. Yeah - I know this is a pretty small wish - but surely it would be easier to implement??<E></E></R></DIV> Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:30:19 GMT https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/0-or-1-for-first-value-in-a-DIM-array/m-p/64334#M39030 Anonymous 2004-11-19T15:30:19Z