<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Question about range in autoscripted objects in Libraries &amp; objects</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Question-about-range-in-autoscripted-objects/m-p/41264#M40286</link>
    <description>I think it is just accuracy of numbers stored in GDL script has been increased between AC 7.0 and AC 8. There is nothing special to worry about.&lt;BR /&gt;
Laszlo</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2004 22:39:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-05-02T22:39:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about range in autoscripted objects</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Question-about-range-in-autoscripted-objects/m-p/41263#M40285</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;
Someone posted the autoscripted 3D script for a window&lt;BR /&gt;
and I noticed that the dimensions were in meters and&lt;BR /&gt;
the number of places or range that AC had written out&lt;BR /&gt;
was 13 places.&lt;BR /&gt;
I made a slab in plan with working units set to meters&lt;BR /&gt;
and saved special, save as archicad object.&lt;BR /&gt;
I opened the 3D script and found that Archicad had&lt;BR /&gt;
written out the dimensions to only seven places.&lt;BR /&gt;
Why the difference?&lt;BR /&gt;
Is it a platform issue?&lt;BR /&gt;
Is it a localization issue?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Puzzled (and envious)&lt;BR /&gt;
Peter Devlin&lt;BR /&gt;
MAC G4&lt;BR /&gt;
450 MHz&lt;BR /&gt;
1.2 GB MEMORY&lt;BR /&gt;
ATI,Rage 128&lt;BR /&gt;
MAC OS 10.3.3&lt;BR /&gt;
MAC OS 9.2.2&lt;BR /&gt;
AC 8.1 v2 (build 2275) (US)&lt;BR /&gt;
AC 6.5 v4 (US)&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 10:14:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Question-about-range-in-autoscripted-objects/m-p/41263#M40285</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T10:14:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about range in autoscripted objects</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Question-about-range-in-autoscripted-objects/m-p/41264#M40286</link>
      <description>I think it is just accuracy of numbers stored in GDL script has been increased between AC 7.0 and AC 8. There is nothing special to worry about.&lt;BR /&gt;
Laszlo</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2004 22:39:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Question-about-range-in-autoscripted-objects/m-p/41264#M40286</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-02T22:39:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about range in autoscripted objects</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Question-about-range-in-autoscripted-objects/m-p/41265#M40287</link>
      <description>Laszlo,&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you for your reply.&lt;BR /&gt;
I did not know that AC had increased it's accuracy.&lt;BR /&gt;
I must have missed this in the documentation.&lt;BR /&gt;
This is good news.&lt;BR /&gt;
Peter</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2004 23:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Question-about-range-in-autoscripted-objects/m-p/41265#M40287</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-02T23:50:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

