<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Library in Libraries &amp; objects</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Library/m-p/2849#M42365</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;At the beginning of my relation with ArchiCAD after listening to the sales pitch of the GS salesman I have asked this question: &lt;BR /&gt;
Jus for long this library parts will remain compatible with the program.  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The answer was : As long as there will be ArchiCAD. I called GS and was reassured of this as a fact, &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And this is the way it was version after version. Since many of us modified library parts and the new version just whipped them out we had a common wish; Name the folder with the version number. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Using this as a subterfuge GS started to name each object with the version number and through “agents” let us understand that there area compatibility/speed problems with the old ones.  This is inadmissible and counterproductive to the dream of GDL being embraced by the industry,&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-11-20T02:22:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Library</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Library/m-p/2849#M42365</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;At the beginning of my relation with ArchiCAD after listening to the sales pitch of the GS salesman I have asked this question: &lt;BR /&gt;
Jus for long this library parts will remain compatible with the program.  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The answer was : As long as there will be ArchiCAD. I called GS and was reassured of this as a fact, &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And this is the way it was version after version. Since many of us modified library parts and the new version just whipped them out we had a common wish; Name the folder with the version number. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Using this as a subterfuge GS started to name each object with the version number and through “agents” let us understand that there area compatibility/speed problems with the old ones.  This is inadmissible and counterproductive to the dream of GDL being embraced by the industry,&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Library/m-p/2849#M42365</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-11-20T02:22:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

