<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Consolidate .lcf + .libpack systems in migrated projects in Libraries &amp; objects</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Consolidate-lcf-libpack-systems-in-migrated-projects/m-p/696708#M52271</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;yes, c/i is still providing current .lcf. all our projects are using the 27 library + 29 cadimage lcf&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;but I have 100+ people and 40+ projects... so things naturally go rogue from time to time. Some teams decided more libraries are more better... and added everything.&lt;BR /&gt;And since archicad doesn't restrict this, some chair 27 are placed and the equivalent generic chair are placed. If i eleminate the .lcf, I lose chair 27. If I eliminate the libpack, I lose generic chair.&lt;BR /&gt;and there's no mechanism to consolidate and say "chair 27 = generic chair"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;so lots of missing or duplicates... no way around it&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 02:55:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Patrick M</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-20T02:55:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Consolidate .lcf + .libpack systems in migrated projects</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Consolidate-lcf-libpack-systems-in-migrated-projects/m-p/696661#M52269</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;in projects started before 29 (or technically before 28), the 27 library + migration library are essential. For teams who mistakenly add in the .libpacks, it seems to have catastrophic repercussion, at least as far as the library loading report is concerned.&lt;BR /&gt;I have whittled it down to where there are either hundreds missing objects, or 1000+ duplicated UI components.&lt;BR /&gt;...&lt;BR /&gt;anyone have any tips on fixing this, short of putting the project on hold for a week or more so I can trudge through and replace all 27.lcf elements with updated .libpack elements?&lt;BR /&gt;It's not as simple as replacing, as I've found the "inject to new library part" trick does not retain the adjusted parameters, size, etc. in the .libpack based elements. Additionally, I need to tear apart the .lcf, since there are STILL elements missing in the .libpacks from the 27 .lcf libraries.&lt;BR /&gt;...&lt;BR /&gt;I know Jared did a great video that covered most of this... but at this point, I have to just tell the team, they are going to see 1200 duplicates in their library manager. I don't have time for something that should be a simple button "consolidate UI library parts"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 19:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Consolidate-lcf-libpack-systems-in-migrated-projects/m-p/696661#M52269</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-19T19:01:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consolidate .lcf + .libpack systems in migrated projects</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Consolidate-lcf-libpack-systems-in-migrated-projects/m-p/696705#M52270</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Being an older file, I assume most of the objects will be 27 + migration objects.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If not to many 28/29 global objects have been placed, it may be easier to remove the libpacks and deal wit a few missing object, replacing them with old 27 ones.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But if a lot of 28/29 objects have been placed then it is manually convert one way or the other or live with the mess of having both libraries loaded.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am not sure if I am imagining things, but I think I saw something from Central Innovation where they converted old objects to the new library packs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or maybe it is just to do with the CI libraries?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I can remember what it was, I will post back.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Barry.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 02:40:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Consolidate-lcf-libpack-systems-in-migrated-projects/m-p/696705#M52270</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-20T02:40:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consolidate .lcf + .libpack systems in migrated projects</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Consolidate-lcf-libpack-systems-in-migrated-projects/m-p/696708#M52271</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes, c/i is still providing current .lcf. all our projects are using the 27 library + 29 cadimage lcf&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;but I have 100+ people and 40+ projects... so things naturally go rogue from time to time. Some teams decided more libraries are more better... and added everything.&lt;BR /&gt;And since archicad doesn't restrict this, some chair 27 are placed and the equivalent generic chair are placed. If i eleminate the .lcf, I lose chair 27. If I eliminate the libpack, I lose generic chair.&lt;BR /&gt;and there's no mechanism to consolidate and say "chair 27 = generic chair"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;so lots of missing or duplicates... no way around it&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 02:55:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Consolidate-lcf-libpack-systems-in-migrated-projects/m-p/696708#M52271</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-20T02:55:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consolidate .lcf + .libpack systems in migrated projects</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Consolidate-lcf-libpack-systems-in-migrated-projects/m-p/696715#M52272</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Time to remove the ability to add new libraries from most of your users...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 05:50:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Consolidate-lcf-libpack-systems-in-migrated-projects/m-p/696715#M52272</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-20T05:50:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Consolidate .lcf + .libpack systems in migrated projects</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Consolidate-lcf-libpack-systems-in-migrated-projects/m-p/696781#M52273</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yeah, if only I had BIM coordinators to pick up that slack...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:20:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/Consolidate-lcf-libpack-systems-in-migrated-projects/m-p/696781#M52273</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-20T14:20:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

