<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic All objects have the same IFC info!? in Libraries &amp; objects</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/All-objects-have-the-same-IFC-info/m-p/252576#M8166</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I think this has to do with my template or setup, or I'm confused - or both! &lt;BR /&gt;
I've just recently started to pay attention to the tags &amp;amp; categories section of objects as we are starting to use BIMx and see the need of proper naming, classification and object properties. One thing I noticed - all info for standard ACad objects is the same? Please see screenshots of two different objects, both standard ArchiCAD objects, one is a toilet, the other one furniture, yet the naming, classification and IFC properties for both are the same! Why? Shouldn't they have their own individual info? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thx in advance for any help and or clarification on this issue.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/72111i027282107718107D/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="Screen Shot 2016-01-23 at 11.45.19 AM copy copy.jpg" title="Screen Shot 2016-01-23 at 11.45.19 AM copy copy.jpg" /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-24T16:10:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>All objects have the same IFC info!?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/All-objects-have-the-same-IFC-info/m-p/252576#M8166</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I think this has to do with my template or setup, or I'm confused - or both! &lt;BR /&gt;
I've just recently started to pay attention to the tags &amp;amp; categories section of objects as we are starting to use BIMx and see the need of proper naming, classification and object properties. One thing I noticed - all info for standard ACad objects is the same? Please see screenshots of two different objects, both standard ArchiCAD objects, one is a toilet, the other one furniture, yet the naming, classification and IFC properties for both are the same! Why? Shouldn't they have their own individual info? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thx in advance for any help and or clarification on this issue.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/72111i027282107718107D/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="Screen Shot 2016-01-23 at 11.45.19 AM copy copy.jpg" title="Screen Shot 2016-01-23 at 11.45.19 AM copy copy.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Libraries-objects/All-objects-have-the-same-IFC-info/m-p/252576#M8166</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-24T16:10:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

