<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISSUE between Grasshopper coordinate points and ArchiCAD components in Parametric design</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/ISSUE-between-Grasshopper-coordinate-points-and-ArchiCAD/m-p/280302#M1143</link>
    <description>I'am not sure what are you calling "iterator" to.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you refer to the "for loop", its just make sure processing time is significant enough for GH to be printed.&lt;BR /&gt;
If you refer to Xrange ,  there is not particular reason. I started my test using really really big numbers (dont ask my why), so I considered a good idea to use xrange because of its better memory management, but range could also be valid as long as this is just a test code (I guess "range" is faster than "xrange", I'am not sure)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
P.S: after looking at google, I see that the "for loop" is considered an iterator, and that xrange is not an iterator but a "immutable sequence", as a tuple. Lesson learned!</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 11:39:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>leceta</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-01T11:39:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISSUE between Grasshopper coordinate points and ArchiCAD components</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/ISSUE-between-Grasshopper-coordinate-points-and-ArchiCAD/m-p/280299#M1140</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;Hi there,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I just wanted to draw your attention to an issue I have just experienced (not a problem, but it might be for big or highly detailed models).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have created a GHpython component that takes points (in Rhino or GH) and adjusts their number of decimal spaces with the aim to get X, Y, Z coordinates, 2D point coordinates, and 3D point coordinates from the input list (to model a mesh).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have observed that in GHpython if I have created a list comprehension functions that export the 3D point coordinates as text in a Rhino format (&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;the one with curly brackets&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;) it take about 3x more than if I used rhino.geometry.point3D method.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In Grasshopper that usually doesn't happen.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Nader Belal&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 09:07:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/ISSUE-between-Grasshopper-coordinate-points-and-ArchiCAD/m-p/280299#M1140</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nader Belal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T09:07:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISSUE between Grasshopper coordinate points and ArchiCAD components</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/ISSUE-between-Grasshopper-coordinate-points-and-ArchiCAD/m-p/280300#M1141</link>
      <description>Hi moonlight, please have a look to the attached image</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 08:43:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/ISSUE-between-Grasshopper-coordinate-points-and-ArchiCAD/m-p/280300#M1141</guid>
      <dc:creator>leceta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-01T08:43:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISSUE between Grasshopper coordinate points and ArchiCAD components</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/ISSUE-between-Grasshopper-coordinate-points-and-ArchiCAD/m-p/280301#M1142</link>
      <description>THank you.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Side question, why are you using an iterator  ??</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 10:54:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/ISSUE-between-Grasshopper-coordinate-points-and-ArchiCAD/m-p/280301#M1142</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nader Belal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-01T10:54:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISSUE between Grasshopper coordinate points and ArchiCAD components</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/ISSUE-between-Grasshopper-coordinate-points-and-ArchiCAD/m-p/280302#M1143</link>
      <description>I'am not sure what are you calling "iterator" to.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you refer to the "for loop", its just make sure processing time is significant enough for GH to be printed.&lt;BR /&gt;
If you refer to Xrange ,  there is not particular reason. I started my test using really really big numbers (dont ask my why), so I considered a good idea to use xrange because of its better memory management, but range could also be valid as long as this is just a test code (I guess "range" is faster than "xrange", I'am not sure)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
P.S: after looking at google, I see that the "for loop" is considered an iterator, and that xrange is not an iterator but a "immutable sequence", as a tuple. Lesson learned!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 11:39:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/ISSUE-between-Grasshopper-coordinate-points-and-ArchiCAD/m-p/280302#M1143</guid>
      <dc:creator>leceta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-01T11:39:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISSUE between Grasshopper coordinate points and ArchiCAD components</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/ISSUE-between-Grasshopper-coordinate-points-and-ArchiCAD/m-p/280303#M1144</link>
      <description>FWIW, in relation to the floating point numbers rounding technique you are using, my current conclusion is that they are not effective, at least in this context (GH + ironPython).</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 11:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/ISSUE-between-Grasshopper-coordinate-points-and-ArchiCAD/m-p/280303#M1144</guid>
      <dc:creator>leceta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-01T11:49:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

