<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Ugly Breps in Parametric design</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/Ugly-Breps/m-p/281786#M1162</link>
    <description>I think currently the Grasshopper-ARCHICAD Connection does not transfer element geometry resulting from Priority Based Connections, such as the stepped Wall skins at corners or stepped skins resulting from an intersection of a Wall and a Slab.&lt;BR /&gt;
These are transferred to Grasshopper as extrusions as far as I can see. I guess the feature just has not been fully developed yet. However, cuts resulting from Solid Element Operations and Trimming to Roofs/Shells do get transferred, so we are getting there.&lt;BR /&gt;
That being said, I fully support you request.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
By the way, I just found that yes, the BREP is triangulated for some reason. I don't know if it is a Grasshopper thing or a GH-AC Connection thing. However, I found you can solve this by connecting the "BREP" or any of the "Surface" outputs of ARCHICAD Deconstruct Nodes into a Grasshopper "Mesh" Node, and it will result in a non-triangulated Mesh Surface. Please note that if the Grasshopper-ARCHICAD Connection is installed, Grasshopper will have 3 Mesh Nodes. You will need the native Grasshopper Mesh Node for this.&lt;BR /&gt;
Or, you could use the "Mesh Brep" Node, which will approximate a BREP with a Mesh geometry, and you can define several parameters for this approximation.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 17:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-09T17:37:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ugly Breps</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/Ugly-Breps/m-p/281784#M1160</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;I was happy when I discovered that in the last connection update Brep extraction was finally added. But why are they so ugly and useless? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I wonder why this is made like this.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;IMG src="https://i.ibb.co/PCxdfCf/gowniane-brepy1.jpg" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is this just a strange looking mesh translated into polysurface? I can't even merge the face.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;IMG src="https://i.ibb.co/jv9NcG7/gowniane-brepy2.jpg" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It is possible to export this geometry in a more or less useful form in conventional way (save Archicad file as 3dm) but it's faaar from parametric approach. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;IMG src="https://i.ibb.co/QbVfVjQ/gowniane-brepy3.jpg" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Any info about when it could be solved? Keep it up devs, I think many people would like to see a good GH-Archicad connection. But IMO it can't be done halfway, either it's solid or it's a game for users of overcoming plugin's limitations - frankly a few have time and will to play it.&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 09:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/Ugly-Breps/m-p/281784#M1160</guid>
      <dc:creator>Czaja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T09:07:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ugly Breps</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/Ugly-Breps/m-p/281785#M1161</link>
      <description>+1 !</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2019 15:47:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/Ugly-Breps/m-p/281785#M1161</guid>
      <dc:creator>leceta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-03T15:47:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ugly Breps</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/Ugly-Breps/m-p/281786#M1162</link>
      <description>I think currently the Grasshopper-ARCHICAD Connection does not transfer element geometry resulting from Priority Based Connections, such as the stepped Wall skins at corners or stepped skins resulting from an intersection of a Wall and a Slab.&lt;BR /&gt;
These are transferred to Grasshopper as extrusions as far as I can see. I guess the feature just has not been fully developed yet. However, cuts resulting from Solid Element Operations and Trimming to Roofs/Shells do get transferred, so we are getting there.&lt;BR /&gt;
That being said, I fully support you request.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
By the way, I just found that yes, the BREP is triangulated for some reason. I don't know if it is a Grasshopper thing or a GH-AC Connection thing. However, I found you can solve this by connecting the "BREP" or any of the "Surface" outputs of ARCHICAD Deconstruct Nodes into a Grasshopper "Mesh" Node, and it will result in a non-triangulated Mesh Surface. Please note that if the Grasshopper-ARCHICAD Connection is installed, Grasshopper will have 3 Mesh Nodes. You will need the native Grasshopper Mesh Node for this.&lt;BR /&gt;
Or, you could use the "Mesh Brep" Node, which will approximate a BREP with a Mesh geometry, and you can define several parameters for this approximation.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 17:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Parametric-design/Ugly-Breps/m-p/281786#M1162</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-09T17:37:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

