<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic accounting for a vapor barrier in calculating energy efficiency in Sustainable design</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/accounting-for-a-vapor-barrier-in-calculating-energy-efficiency/m-p/258400#M370</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;Good day!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sorry for my English, I write through Google translator&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tell me, does the building energy efficiency calculation tool take into account the presence in the vapor barrier cake?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;According to my calculations, it should significantly affect heat engineering, but when the material is introduced into the multilayer structure, with the parameters of the vapor barrier, the picture does not change.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 08:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-11T08:30:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>accounting for a vapor barrier in calculating energy efficiency</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/accounting-for-a-vapor-barrier-in-calculating-energy-efficiency/m-p/258400#M370</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;Good day!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sorry for my English, I write through Google translator&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tell me, does the building energy efficiency calculation tool take into account the presence in the vapor barrier cake?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;According to my calculations, it should significantly affect heat engineering, but when the material is introduced into the multilayer structure, with the parameters of the vapor barrier, the picture does not change.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 08:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/accounting-for-a-vapor-barrier-in-calculating-energy-efficiency/m-p/258400#M370</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T08:30:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: accounting for a vapor barrier in calculating energy efficiency</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/accounting-for-a-vapor-barrier-in-calculating-energy-efficiency/m-p/258401#M371</link>
      <description>Airtightness is more important than a vapour barrier. You will see an infiltration rate for every unique opening and 'structure' in the ecodesigner dialogue. When you adjust or reduce these from their defaults, you will see a reduced heatloss from reduced air leakage or infiltration - and this is the ultimate purpose of any air barrier (or what you are calling a vapour barrier). Best, Andy</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:26:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/accounting-for-a-vapor-barrier-in-calculating-energy-efficiency/m-p/258401#M371</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andy Thomson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-06T14:26:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

