<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WHY is this session called &amp;quot;green&amp;quot;? in Sustainable design</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/WHY-is-this-session-called-quot-green-quot/m-p/191895#M854</link>
    <description>Hi Enrico&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I think You're not alone, this was also my first question when I saw the title last evening, and I shared my opinion with laszlonagy too (in the session's sticky). &lt;BR /&gt;
In the majority of the cases green doesn't mean energy efficient at all.   &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I subscribe Your request!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Best regards, Ede</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:39:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-11T13:39:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WHY is this session called "green"?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/WHY-is-this-session-called-quot-green-quot/m-p/191894#M853</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I'm sorry to point it out, it's the first time I see this new session and I find it very cliché to name it "green architecture". Is it just me?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
With the spin the AEC industry has taken in the last 5-6 years, I find that the greener the look, the least environmentally friendly or sustainable a project is.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is it too late to rename it, please?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here some options from the top of my head:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- EcoDesigner (because most questions are going to be about it, right?)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- Energy and Environment;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- Sustainable architecture...&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 08:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/WHY-is-this-session-called-quot-green-quot/m-p/191894#M853</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T08:22:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WHY is this session called "green"?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/WHY-is-this-session-called-quot-green-quot/m-p/191895#M854</link>
      <description>Hi Enrico&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I think You're not alone, this was also my first question when I saw the title last evening, and I shared my opinion with laszlonagy too (in the session's sticky). &lt;BR /&gt;
In the majority of the cases green doesn't mean energy efficient at all.   &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I subscribe Your request!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Best regards, Ede</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:39:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/WHY-is-this-session-called-quot-green-quot/m-p/191895#M854</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-11T13:39:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WHY is this session called "green"?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/WHY-is-this-session-called-quot-green-quot/m-p/191896#M855</link>
      <description>Your wishes has just been granted. &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:23:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/WHY-is-this-session-called-quot-green-quot/m-p/191896#M855</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-11T14:23:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WHY is this session called "green"?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/WHY-is-this-session-called-quot-green-quot/m-p/191897#M856</link>
      <description>Thank you László &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
it's a big relief for us &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards, Ede</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/WHY-is-this-session-called-quot-green-quot/m-p/191897#M856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-11T14:46:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WHY is this session called "green"?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/WHY-is-this-session-called-quot-green-quot/m-p/191898#M857</link>
      <description>Thank you!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 06:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/WHY-is-this-session-called-quot-green-quot/m-p/191898#M857</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-12T06:29:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

