<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Energy ratings and council approvals in Sustainable design</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/Energy-ratings-and-council-approvals/m-p/145989#M962</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Where are we in getting our Eco-Designer calculated energy ratings approved by our Australian authorities? How much longer must we, as Archicad users, calculate the ratings manually when all the information for doing so is already included in our building model? Are we protecting the employment of energy raters, or are there real reasons for delaying such approvals?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 08:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KeesW</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-11T08:27:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Energy ratings and council approvals</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/Energy-ratings-and-council-approvals/m-p/145989#M962</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Where are we in getting our Eco-Designer calculated energy ratings approved by our Australian authorities? How much longer must we, as Archicad users, calculate the ratings manually when all the information for doing so is already included in our building model? Are we protecting the employment of energy raters, or are there real reasons for delaying such approvals?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 08:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/Energy-ratings-and-council-approvals/m-p/145989#M962</guid>
      <dc:creator>KeesW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T08:27:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Energy ratings and council approvals</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/Energy-ratings-and-council-approvals/m-p/145990#M963</link>
      <description>Hi, &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We(GSHQ &amp;amp; GSAUS) pushing EcoDesigner* development in the direction so that we can get the software validated according to Green Star AU/NABERS, BCA Section J and NatHERS. GSHQ is currently working on LEED (USA) and then w e will be focusing on the AUS energy accreditation and protocols.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Kevin Lee&lt;BR /&gt;
GRAPHISOFT AUSTRALIA&lt;BR /&gt;
Sustainable Product Specialist</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:53:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/Energy-ratings-and-council-approvals/m-p/145990#M963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-24T20:53:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Energy ratings and council approvals</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/Energy-ratings-and-council-approvals/m-p/145991#M964</link>
      <description>That's good news - is there an ETA?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 22:46:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Sustainable-design/Energy-ratings-and-council-approvals/m-p/145991#M964</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-26T22:46:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

