<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NAS box and Teamwork in Teamwork &amp; BIMcloud</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/NAS-box-and-Teamwork/m-p/249198#M1111</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;We are not yet in the Archicad fold. Still researching, so excuse my ignorance.&lt;BR /&gt;
Our situation.&lt;BR /&gt;
Recently we bought an expensive NAS with fast I/O performance that acts as a file repository/server for the office.&lt;BR /&gt;
We work in 2d at the moment and have a peer to peer Windows network.&lt;BR /&gt;
I bought the NAS because Microsoft artificially limits the number of machines in a peer to peer to 20, and we are just over that. The NAS doesn't care.&lt;BR /&gt;
We don't need to access each-other's windows machines.&lt;BR /&gt;
I don't want to go to Windows Server, with all the administrative overhead.&lt;BR /&gt;
We don't need individual user profiles - all the machines use the same logon and password. Works fine for us.&lt;BR /&gt;
On any project there may be as few as 1 person to very rarely up to 4 people working on the same project at the same time.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So:&lt;BR /&gt;
If we move to Archicad - where we want up to around 4 people working in the same model, is it possible to maintain our NAS/Windows peer to peer environment?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 06:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-27T06:43:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAS box and Teamwork</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/NAS-box-and-Teamwork/m-p/249198#M1111</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;We are not yet in the Archicad fold. Still researching, so excuse my ignorance.&lt;BR /&gt;
Our situation.&lt;BR /&gt;
Recently we bought an expensive NAS with fast I/O performance that acts as a file repository/server for the office.&lt;BR /&gt;
We work in 2d at the moment and have a peer to peer Windows network.&lt;BR /&gt;
I bought the NAS because Microsoft artificially limits the number of machines in a peer to peer to 20, and we are just over that. The NAS doesn't care.&lt;BR /&gt;
We don't need to access each-other's windows machines.&lt;BR /&gt;
I don't want to go to Windows Server, with all the administrative overhead.&lt;BR /&gt;
We don't need individual user profiles - all the machines use the same logon and password. Works fine for us.&lt;BR /&gt;
On any project there may be as few as 1 person to very rarely up to 4 people working on the same project at the same time.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So:&lt;BR /&gt;
If we move to Archicad - where we want up to around 4 people working in the same model, is it possible to maintain our NAS/Windows peer to peer environment?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 06:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/NAS-box-and-Teamwork/m-p/249198#M1111</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-27T06:43:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAS box and Teamwork</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/NAS-box-and-Teamwork/m-p/249199#M1112</link>
      <description>Hi Yorge,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "peer to peer environment", but in terms of ArchiCAD and storing references  - it doesn't really matter where or how they are stored, as long as the paths on each ArchiCAD client are the same.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/NAS-box-and-Teamwork/m-p/249199#M1112</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-25T09:16:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

