<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: bim server mac hardware requirements in Teamwork &amp; BIMcloud</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/bim-server-mac-hardware-requirements/m-p/201439#M3422</link>
    <description>juha,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
thanks for your encouraging reply.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
i agree that keeping file sizes down might be the key, which unfortunately is not always possible due to complexity of a project.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
we are currently considering one of the following 2 options:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
A. additional mac mini's, essentially distributing the load;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
B. 1 x mac pro, hosting all projects;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
from a management perspective the mac pro has obvious benefits (libraries, DNS setup, etc.), but the question remains if with TW2 a mac pro (more cores &amp;amp; RAM) will actually be able to provide any significant performance gains.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
any thoughts much appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ds.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:48:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>schagemann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-14T00:48:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>bim server mac hardware requirements</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/bim-server-mac-hardware-requirements/m-p/201437#M3420</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;dear all,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
we are interested in your experiences regarding bim server mac hardware requirements.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
we do run a couple of bim servers on mac minis, however it seems that there is only so much they are able to do as with e.g. around 10-15 users accessing around 20 files (approx. between 100 - 900 MB each) concurrently it seems that the current model mac mini (core 2 duo, 8GB RAM) reaches its limits.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
also we are intriguied by the following quote on the archicadwiki:&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;The BIM Server is a multi-threaded application that from the start takes advantage of every core. Commonly a single core will be singled out for the bulk of one user’s ArchiCAD operations. Another user will end up being processed by a different core. The server will balance use across the physical cores. The more physical cores there are the better. A small office should use at least a dual core machine for its BIM Server. Although with the costs of quad cores so reasonable it is hard to justify not starting with a better machine.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
From a BIM Server performance standpoint a 2 processor machine runs just as well as a single processor duo core machine.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

source: &lt;A href="http://www.archicadwiki.com/Teamwork/BimServerSpecification" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://www.archicadwiki.com/Teamwork/Bi ... cification"&gt;http://www.archicadwiki.com/Teamwork/BimServerSpecification&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
so basically and as usual the more grunt the better - however we have also heard reports that running a bim server on a designated xserve with 32GB does not seem to run much smoother - really we are wondering were the sweetspot lies here.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
so if you care to share your mac based setup and your experiences with it , it would be much appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ds.&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:59:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/bim-server-mac-hardware-requirements/m-p/201437#M3420</guid>
      <dc:creator>schagemann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-07T13:59:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bim server mac hardware requirements</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/bim-server-mac-hardware-requirements/m-p/201438#M3421</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;
We have similar amount of users+projects and a&lt;BR /&gt;
similar MacMini server but having only 4Gb RAM. &lt;BR /&gt;
Everything running well.&lt;BR /&gt;
A noticeable difference is in the file size; a typical team &lt;BR /&gt;
file is well under 100 Mb and the biggest ones around or&lt;BR /&gt;
less than 200 Mb.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In addition we have a remote 3rd party virtual server (Windows Server 2008) with much more humble configuration. That server is also having &lt;BR /&gt;
around a dozen of projects sized 15...200 Mb. It works well &lt;BR /&gt;
but I guess it occasionally gets more RAM than dedicated/paid for.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I wonder that keeping the file size down might be the key?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
HTH, Juha</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:51:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/bim-server-mac-hardware-requirements/m-p/201438#M3421</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-07T17:51:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bim server mac hardware requirements</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/bim-server-mac-hardware-requirements/m-p/201439#M3422</link>
      <description>juha,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
thanks for your encouraging reply.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
i agree that keeping file sizes down might be the key, which unfortunately is not always possible due to complexity of a project.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
we are currently considering one of the following 2 options:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
A. additional mac mini's, essentially distributing the load;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
B. 1 x mac pro, hosting all projects;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
from a management perspective the mac pro has obvious benefits (libraries, DNS setup, etc.), but the question remains if with TW2 a mac pro (more cores &amp;amp; RAM) will actually be able to provide any significant performance gains.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
any thoughts much appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ds.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:48:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/bim-server-mac-hardware-requirements/m-p/201439#M3422</guid>
      <dc:creator>schagemann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-14T00:48:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

