<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic bim server user management to cater for multiple bim servers in Teamwork &amp; BIMcloud</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/bim-server-user-management-to-cater-for-multiple-bim-servers/m-p/141486#M3609</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;hello,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
apart from the known deficiencies of the AC14 bim server, here another thought for discussion.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
i reckon graphisoft needs to rethink the current approach to bimserver user management (and at the same time should redo the bim server manager... ).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
dealing with an ever growing user database as we move more projects to our current bim server is a already a real pain, but think of the pain of managing users on various bim servers. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
in addition, check out this &lt;A href="http://goo.gl/zliik" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;A href="http://goo.gl/zliik" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;http://goo.gl/zliik&amp;lt;e&amp;gt;"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/S&gt;http://goo.gl/zliik&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; archicadwiki entry, for GS' latest recommendations on bim server best practices...&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Since each module has its own memory footprint, CPU cycle usage, and open ports, one module is the optimal number&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

here my suggestion: a central user repository (AD, OD, LDAP), which can be used by various bim servers connected to it.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
any thoughts appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ds.&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 07:50:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>schagemann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-14T07:50:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>bim server user management to cater for multiple bim servers</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/bim-server-user-management-to-cater-for-multiple-bim-servers/m-p/141486#M3609</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;hello,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
apart from the known deficiencies of the AC14 bim server, here another thought for discussion.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
i reckon graphisoft needs to rethink the current approach to bimserver user management (and at the same time should redo the bim server manager... ).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
dealing with an ever growing user database as we move more projects to our current bim server is a already a real pain, but think of the pain of managing users on various bim servers. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
in addition, check out this &lt;A href="http://goo.gl/zliik" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;A href="http://goo.gl/zliik" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;http://goo.gl/zliik&amp;lt;e&amp;gt;"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/S&gt;http://goo.gl/zliik&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; archicadwiki entry, for GS' latest recommendations on bim server best practices...&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Since each module has its own memory footprint, CPU cycle usage, and open ports, one module is the optimal number&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

here my suggestion: a central user repository (AD, OD, LDAP), which can be used by various bim servers connected to it.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
any thoughts appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ds.&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 07:50:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/bim-server-user-management-to-cater-for-multiple-bim-servers/m-p/141486#M3609</guid>
      <dc:creator>schagemann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-14T07:50:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

