<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BIM server hardware cost in Teamwork &amp; BIMcloud</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/BIM-server-hardware-cost/m-p/203653#M3797</link>
    <description>I paid around 1200 for an entry level server tuning win sbs 2003 way back when. I must say it is extraordinarily reliable until you change a setting and then all hell breaks loose. Before breaking out a sweat and changing everything to mac, I considered upgrading the software only.... but then I heard how loud and compact a Mac mini server was, and the price.... and simplicity... ultimately my decision was easy. I can still turn the old server on but it makes such a racket. Anyway, it's there if I need it. The Bim Server will still run on sbs 2003, so it's a spare brick. I think the Mac mini with osx 10.7 server is very economical unless you have an old server hanging around with a bit of ram. Obsolete technology is a perfect candidate really.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:11:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-13T12:11:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BIM server hardware cost</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/BIM-server-hardware-cost/m-p/203652#M3796</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;g'day,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
the other day we looked into hardware alternatives to the current apple line up, of which we have used mac mini's as designated bim servers so far.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
surprisingly we found that the mac mini seems to be a real steal, compared to equivalent workstations and especially servers by both dell and hp - servers are almost double in price, due to MS SBS pricing...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
given that we are successfully operating a couple of mac mini based bimservers, we are wondering if we are missing something here or if other users can confirm these findings.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ds.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:53:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/BIM-server-hardware-cost/m-p/203652#M3796</guid>
      <dc:creator>schagemann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-13T11:53:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM server hardware cost</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/BIM-server-hardware-cost/m-p/203653#M3797</link>
      <description>I paid around 1200 for an entry level server tuning win sbs 2003 way back when. I must say it is extraordinarily reliable until you change a setting and then all hell breaks loose. Before breaking out a sweat and changing everything to mac, I considered upgrading the software only.... but then I heard how loud and compact a Mac mini server was, and the price.... and simplicity... ultimately my decision was easy. I can still turn the old server on but it makes such a racket. Anyway, it's there if I need it. The Bim Server will still run on sbs 2003, so it's a spare brick. I think the Mac mini with osx 10.7 server is very economical unless you have an old server hanging around with a bit of ram. Obsolete technology is a perfect candidate really.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:11:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/BIM-server-hardware-cost/m-p/203653#M3797</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-13T12:11:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

