<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Library Size and Number of Attributes - Impact on Performance in Teamwork &amp; BIMcloud</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/Library-Size-and-Number-of-Attributes-Impact-on-Performance/m-p/576531#M6520</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I’m working on creating our office’s template for AC27 – we are migrating from AC25. I’m excited to see we can now organize attributes within folders (and more easily find attributes with the help of the search function).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Historically, we have tried to keep the number of surfaces in our template pretty low, partially because it makes it easier to quickly scan the list and make a selection. Now that we can use folders, I’m thinking about having our normal “base” set of surfaces and then creating folders that would hold a number of additional surfaces. For example, we would have 4 types of siding surfaces in the “base” selection and then we would have an “Additional Siding” folder with about 30 additional surfaces users could pick from.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The .jpg textures that make up the “Additional Siding” surfaces will be stored in a library folder on our BIMcloud Basic server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question #1: Will having these additional .jpg texture images in our BIMcloud Basic library make a large impact on Archicad’s performance? The .jpgs folder for the 30 additional surfaces is 25MB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question #2: Will having the 30 additional surface attributes as part of the template make a large impact on Archicad’s performance?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:35:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RileyDA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-21T00:35:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Library Size and Number of Attributes - Impact on Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/Library-Size-and-Number-of-Attributes-Impact-on-Performance/m-p/576531#M6520</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I’m working on creating our office’s template for AC27 – we are migrating from AC25. I’m excited to see we can now organize attributes within folders (and more easily find attributes with the help of the search function).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Historically, we have tried to keep the number of surfaces in our template pretty low, partially because it makes it easier to quickly scan the list and make a selection. Now that we can use folders, I’m thinking about having our normal “base” set of surfaces and then creating folders that would hold a number of additional surfaces. For example, we would have 4 types of siding surfaces in the “base” selection and then we would have an “Additional Siding” folder with about 30 additional surfaces users could pick from.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The .jpg textures that make up the “Additional Siding” surfaces will be stored in a library folder on our BIMcloud Basic server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question #1: Will having these additional .jpg texture images in our BIMcloud Basic library make a large impact on Archicad’s performance? The .jpgs folder for the 30 additional surfaces is 25MB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question #2: Will having the 30 additional surface attributes as part of the template make a large impact on Archicad’s performance?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:35:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/Library-Size-and-Number-of-Attributes-Impact-on-Performance/m-p/576531#M6520</guid>
      <dc:creator>RileyDA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T00:35:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Library Size and Number of Attributes - Impact on Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/Library-Size-and-Number-of-Attributes-Impact-on-Performance/m-p/576545#M6521</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Questions 1 &amp;amp; 2 - I don't think you will notice any significant performance hit, unless you have very low spec machines.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't use BIMCloud, but my Texture and Picture library that gets loaded with every file is over 2GB in size.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Barry.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 01:45:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/Library-Size-and-Number-of-Attributes-Impact-on-Performance/m-p/576545#M6521</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T01:45:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Library Size and Number of Attributes - Impact on Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/Library-Size-and-Number-of-Attributes-Impact-on-Performance/m-p/576721#M6522</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, Barry! That is reassuring.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would love to hear from others about their experience with texture/picture library sizes on BIMcloud Basic.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Teamwork-BIMcloud/Library-Size-and-Number-of-Attributes-Impact-on-Performance/m-p/576721#M6522</guid>
      <dc:creator>RileyDA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T20:09:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

