<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Site Photo Used as Background Image in Visualization</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Site-Photo-Used-as-Background-Image/m-p/198932#M10647</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I would like to use a photo taken at the site as a background image for my ArchiCAD model. The final rendering needs to be at least 11x17" and I am having trouble getting a photo that has a high enough resolution so that the background image is crisp when I render it at that size. The highest resolution I can get from my camera is 2080x1544. Any help would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 10:13:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-11T10:13:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Site Photo Used as Background Image</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Site-Photo-Used-as-Background-Image/m-p/198932#M10647</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I would like to use a photo taken at the site as a background image for my ArchiCAD model. The final rendering needs to be at least 11x17" and I am having trouble getting a photo that has a high enough resolution so that the background image is crisp when I render it at that size. The highest resolution I can get from my camera is 2080x1544. Any help would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 10:13:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Site-Photo-Used-as-Background-Image/m-p/198932#M10647</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T10:13:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Site Photo Used as Background Image</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Site-Photo-Used-as-Background-Image/m-p/198933#M10648</link>
      <description>2080pixels/17" = 122 dpi. That's not so bad. The best inkjets can only use 180 or so. Make bigger borders on the 11x17 sheet. No one will notice.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The sad truth is that most Archicad textures don't support higher resolution renderings like you seek. But, if you must:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
1: Buy a new camera that makes bigger images. 2080 is very tiny in 2010.   [Nikon Coolpix L22: $129. for a buzzillion pixels.]&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.amazon.com/Coolpix-L22-Digital-3-0-Inch-Blue/dp/B0036ORZBY" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://www.amazon.com/Coolpix-L22-Digit ... B0036ORZBY"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Coolpix-L22-Digital-3-0-Inch-Blue/dp/B0036ORZBY&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
2: If not, then use a pixel-doubling application like Genuine Fractals or Topaz Enlarge. These applications add pixels to make an image APPEAR sharper without actually providing more information.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:21:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Site-Photo-Used-as-Background-Image/m-p/198933#M10648</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-02T00:21:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Site Photo Used as Background Image</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Site-Photo-Used-as-Background-Image/m-p/198934#M10649</link>
      <description>Or wat about photostitching to up the file size the honest way?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:34:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Site-Photo-Used-as-Background-Image/m-p/198934#M10649</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chazz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-02T05:34:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Site Photo Used as Background Image</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Site-Photo-Used-as-Background-Image/m-p/198935#M10650</link>
      <description>Good point. The images could be taken vertically with generous overlap.&lt;BR /&gt;
You could stitch images easily in Photoshop [or some lesser programs], but that leads to an inconsistent vanishing point, destroying any possibility of accurate model position when placed in the scene. &lt;BR /&gt;
OR: place the rendered image later in Photoshop, distorting it as needed to suit the faked-up context.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This guy's solution costs $129. Why would he repeatedly persist in using expensive professional labor to compensate for a sub standard camera?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:46:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Site-Photo-Used-as-Background-Image/m-p/198935#M10650</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-02T05:46:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

