<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cinema 4D Architectural Edition in Visualization</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Cinema-4D-Architectural-Edition/m-p/141283#M11048</link>
    <description>It certainly does work like a dream!&lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_biggrin.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
I've had it sitting around for weeks and finally got around to testing it. It's just annoying that Graphisoft and Maxon have forced us into this position. Still no news on 'official' versions, that's just plain slack!&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:30:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Wokka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-10T23:30:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cinema 4D Architectural Edition</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Cinema-4D-Architectural-Edition/m-p/141280#M11045</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I was thinking about picking up Cinema 4D to bring my renderings &amp;amp; modeling to the next level. Is it worthwhile to get the Architectural version? I don't really need the extra objects but the virtual walkthrough sounds cool.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is anyone using this version?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 11:28:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Cinema-4D-Architectural-Edition/m-p/141280#M11045</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T11:28:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cinema 4D Architectural Edition</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Cinema-4D-Architectural-Edition/m-p/141281#M11046</link>
      <description>I really really really hate to say this &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_cry.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;(as I've been using Archicad/C4D/Vray for about 6 years now), but the exchange plugin between C4D and ArchiCad doesn't work at the moment. Ask your Maxon supplier about it! Ask him to guarantee that the exchange plugin ( &lt;A href="http://www.maxon.net/index.php?id=21" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.maxon.net/index.php?id=21&lt;/A&gt; ) works between R12 Archicad and C4D &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
see : &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=147284#147284" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/vie ... 284#147284"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=147284#147284&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
There is a plugin made by prot158 that is suppose to be good but I haven't tested it and haven't had time. I'm still waiting on Maxon/Graohisoft to accept some responsibility and stop pointing fingers at each other.  Sorry for the quick rant, this is a real bug bear of mine...... &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_evil.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When it does work it's dream &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:19:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Cinema-4D-Architectural-Edition/m-p/141281#M11046</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wokka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-02T12:19:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cinema 4D Architectural Edition</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Cinema-4D-Architectural-Edition/m-p/141282#M11047</link>
      <description>It works like a dream!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://dinnye.neobase.hu/" target="_blank"&gt;http://dinnye.neobase.hu/&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Cinema-4D-Architectural-Edition/m-p/141282#M11047</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-10T17:14:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cinema 4D Architectural Edition</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Cinema-4D-Architectural-Edition/m-p/141283#M11048</link>
      <description>It certainly does work like a dream!&lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_biggrin.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
I've had it sitting around for weeks and finally got around to testing it. It's just annoying that Graphisoft and Maxon have forced us into this position. Still no news on 'official' versions, that's just plain slack!&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:30:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Cinema-4D-Architectural-Edition/m-p/141283#M11048</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wokka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-10T23:30:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cinema 4D Architectural Edition</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Cinema-4D-Architectural-Edition/m-p/141284#M11049</link>
      <description>I am interested in C4D Architecture Edition with VRay ( 64 bit.)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
How do you think this will work with ArchiCAD 13 and Windows 7 ?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:51:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Cinema-4D-Architectural-Edition/m-p/141284#M11049</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve Jepson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-07T20:51:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

