<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Personal Preference in Visualization</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137914#M12472</link>
    <description>YEAH!! Kliment I like your improvements &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am planning on doing it again with some direct sunlight into the room. Now where is that spare 5 minutes I left lying around here?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Mike</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 06:03:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-05-28T06:03:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Personal Preference</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137908#M12466</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Neither of these images are, in my opinion, really that good. I like one more than the other tho.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My question is: which one do you like more, for whatever reason, and I understand that you may not like either of them very much, for what ever reason, but do you prefer the look of one over the other?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Mike&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="Image 01.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10902i2A92AEA9EA63BE18/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Image 01.jpg" alt="Image 01.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 13:54:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137908#M12466</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T13:54:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Personal Preference</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137909#M12467</link>
      <description>Image 02</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 02:25:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137909#M12467</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-25T02:25:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Personal Preference</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137910#M12468</link>
      <description>mike,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
the 2nd .. texturing and lighting are much better. Still a little flat looking though, you need to get a bit more dynamic range into the image. It looks like everything is being lit by ambient only with no direct light sources such as lights or sun - these will help add some contrast and liven things up a bit.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Are these both done in AC? Could be wrong but the second one seems like a different render engine ..  i am not that familiar with AC rendering as anything other than shaded/hidden line images gets done in external apps</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:42:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137910#M12468</guid>
      <dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-25T10:42:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Personal Preference</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137911#M12469</link>
      <description>I'd like to see a mixture of the two pictures! &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
The first artificially made "alive" by light cones, shine  around light fixtures and too much reflections. I can't understad if this is a daytime or night render - the amount of light from windows and lights is the same! &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
The second image is just the opposite - absolutely flat! No reflections, no shadows.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Have a look at this - AC10 LW by tgr:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com//files/window_light_solution_214.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com//fi ... on_214.jpg"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com//files/window_light_solution_214.jpg&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:00:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137911#M12469</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-25T12:00:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Personal Preference</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137912#M12470</link>
      <description>HI Mike&lt;BR /&gt;
By far the second.&lt;BR /&gt;
Actually as I look at it as a photograph, it does have shadow and highlight detail along with mid tones.&lt;BR /&gt;
The dynamic range is there.&lt;BR /&gt;
What is missing is excessive specular highlights which are IMHO overdone in the first and I don't miss them for a personal reason.  I would much,much more prefer to spend time in the second with it's more relaxing atmosphere.&lt;BR /&gt;
But others like drama I guess.&lt;BR /&gt;
As a comment to outside light looking the same, which it doesn't in my opinion, it is what I try to achieve in my indoor real photographs,(not an easy thing to do) to bring the light levels to within film range.&lt;BR /&gt;
Nice work, which I could do that good.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:11:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137912#M12470</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T05:11:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Personal Preference</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137913#M12471</link>
      <description>A simple Photoshop correction  - brightnes/contrast and colour balance. This doesn't compensate for lack of direct light from windows and shadows.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/68266iBDC16C34150A25C0/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="t_image_02_251.jpg" title="t_image_02_251.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:39:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137913#M12471</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T07:39:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Personal Preference</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137914#M12472</link>
      <description>YEAH!! Kliment I like your improvements &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am planning on doing it again with some direct sunlight into the room. Now where is that spare 5 minutes I left lying around here?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Mike</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 06:03:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Personal-Preference/m-p/137914#M12472</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-28T06:03:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

