topic opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10) in Visualization

opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Anonymous — Thu, 11 May 2023 10:29:04 GMT

Hi.

I'm quite new in this sort of thing like rendering, visualization , so i need advice what is wrong or what is ok.
I will be very grateful.

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Anonymous — Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:30:40 GMT

kitchen2

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Anonymous — Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:31:54 GMT

bedroom

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Anonymous — Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:32:32 GMT

bedroom2

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Anonymous — Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:33:35 GMT

toilet

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Dwight — Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:07:58 GMT

Generally, you should consider the color of light - light is NOT white. Light combines blue and yellow.

Surfaces need roughness and texture to interact realistically with light.

You appear to be trying to light the spaces with lamps, or light fixtures. This is wrong.

You want to use light fixtures as props - at minimum power to show that they give off light. You want to illuminate the space like a photographer would.....with big duffuse llights.

There's a book on using this approach.

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Anonymous — Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:39:12 GMT

Thx, Dwight.
I will try your suggestion
It is common sense that light is not clear white. My mistake.

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Anonymous — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:32:05 GMT

Why do you show your pictures from the viewpoint of a fly?
When you take a picture of your real room, do you always step on a chair and raise your camera?

Try human view! (Average person height 175cm)

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Anonymous — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:30:39 GMT

Something else - camera view angle is very wide and makes rooms seem like corridors.

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Dwight — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:08:42 GMT

Good Point.

Small rooms present a challenge similar to that seen in the cinematography of "Riding In Cars With Boys." The cul-de-sac house becomes central to the movie. How DID they do the shots in that tiny house?

They cheated.

They actually built a house with sliding room extensions - like a hifalutin travel trailer - so the camera could sit back to achieve a proper view angle.

There's quite an exposition of this process on the DVD. Entire rooms slide out, but maintain the light quality of the room - nothing opens to the sky.

To fix small rooms - just for the rendering - you marquee the building, stretching the floor slab and roof slab along with the walls until there's a place for the camera to shoot at an aspect of 60 degrees.

Composition is everything.

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Anonymous — Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:22:28 GMT

Thx one more for advice, i will try to improve my work according to them.

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Dwight — Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:47:13 GMT

Just keep practicing and looking at photographs of real spaces.

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Anonymous — Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:04:30 GMT

Yes, Dwight is right!
A bit of advice form ne too - take a picture of your room and try to duplicate it in 3D! You'll be able to see the differences right away.

Re: opinion about the rendering in LW (AC10)

Dwight — Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:13:30 GMT

Except that merely taking a picture of a room and replicating it is NOT the answer.

You need to think like a professional photographer would, and that means bringing more light in order to fill the murky parts of the room, just like a pro would, and just like the photos in the architectural magazines are.

Recommended reading:

http://www.amazon.com/Interior-Photography-Lighting-Professional-Techniques/dp/0817440240