<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LightWorks in ArchiCAD in Visualization</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/LightWorks-in-ArchiCAD/m-p/39594#M18254</link>
    <description>You don't need to see anything. &lt;BR /&gt;
The battle is "No contest" for image quality. &lt;BR /&gt;
Artlantis = radiosity&lt;BR /&gt;
LighWorks (today) = raytracing (with coal)&lt;BR /&gt;
LightWorks goes to the mat. &lt;BR /&gt;
Face down and knocked cold.&lt;BR /&gt;
The glove of the Parisian Artlantisoid is raised in victory, even though fuelled by red wine, poached rabbit and soft, fragrant cheeses.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
There's no question that Artlantis, relative to the degree of implementation of LightWorks in ArchiCAD is:&lt;BR /&gt;
1: having better light quality in renderings.&lt;BR /&gt;
2: easier to edit, preview and predict. &lt;BR /&gt;
3: F A S T E R !! !  !   !     !          !            !         &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In my opinion - as an intermediate user of Artlantis - drawbacks are:&lt;BR /&gt;
1: material management&lt;BR /&gt;
2: adaptation of textures to irregular surfaces&lt;BR /&gt;
3: management of textures&lt;BR /&gt;
4: file transfer/edit issues&lt;BR /&gt;
5: Like a fullback on the Winnipeg Blue bombers footbal team: It's got the SIZE - big renderings.&lt;BR /&gt;
6: Camera control is adequate for flythroughs unlike in ArchiCAD where it is rudimentary.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here are MY observations:&lt;BR /&gt;
1: I love Artlantis as a playful experience. You can learn a ot about rendering quickly playing in Artlantis.&lt;BR /&gt;
2: LightWorks need expertise and patience.&lt;BR /&gt;
3: LightWorks has slowed down but gotten better in ArchiCAD 10.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have done paid work in LightWorks - I don't think it is productive enough or makes a sufficiently sophisticated image for professional work.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And besides, my heart is broken by Graphisoft's implementation of LightWorks. Just look at what this company's product can do when completely implemented:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.lightworks-user.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.lightworks-user.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Chose LightWorks if:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You have a tight relation between design and image - as do I with my work being public art - short turnaround time - a day, say, with lots of changes and evaluations. Rarely need huge renderings. Rarely need photorendering - often overlay a sketch rendering on a photorendering for final drawing.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Chose Artlantis if:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-- You aspire to being an illustrator and want to learn more. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-- You occasionally (often) need to disguise the weakness of your design work with wonderful luminous radiance.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In reviewing the possibility of doing an Artlantis book, I asked them who their buyers were "An architect who makes three renderings a year."&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Finally: &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I don't think of Artlantis as the end of the road. It is a coffee, powdered nasal excitement and gas stop. If you want to change your career, invest your time and money in real rendering/modeling programs like: Cinema 4D, LightWave, Electric Image, and the infamous but widely supported Threedee Studio. And others.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-07-24T13:38:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LightWorks in ArchiCAD</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/LightWorks-in-ArchiCAD/m-p/39593#M18253</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi Everybody,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'd like to see some renders with LightWorks for ArchiCAD to compare it with Art.lantis Studio. Specially renders with radiosity and global illumination. I know Dwight have a great experience in LW... So... Dwight: Would you please give us a comparison (pros/cons) between this two programs/engines?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Braza&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 12:24:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/LightWorks-in-ArchiCAD/m-p/39593#M18253</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T12:24:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LightWorks in ArchiCAD</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/LightWorks-in-ArchiCAD/m-p/39594#M18254</link>
      <description>You don't need to see anything. &lt;BR /&gt;
The battle is "No contest" for image quality. &lt;BR /&gt;
Artlantis = radiosity&lt;BR /&gt;
LighWorks (today) = raytracing (with coal)&lt;BR /&gt;
LightWorks goes to the mat. &lt;BR /&gt;
Face down and knocked cold.&lt;BR /&gt;
The glove of the Parisian Artlantisoid is raised in victory, even though fuelled by red wine, poached rabbit and soft, fragrant cheeses.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
There's no question that Artlantis, relative to the degree of implementation of LightWorks in ArchiCAD is:&lt;BR /&gt;
1: having better light quality in renderings.&lt;BR /&gt;
2: easier to edit, preview and predict. &lt;BR /&gt;
3: F A S T E R !! !  !   !     !          !            !         &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In my opinion - as an intermediate user of Artlantis - drawbacks are:&lt;BR /&gt;
1: material management&lt;BR /&gt;
2: adaptation of textures to irregular surfaces&lt;BR /&gt;
3: management of textures&lt;BR /&gt;
4: file transfer/edit issues&lt;BR /&gt;
5: Like a fullback on the Winnipeg Blue bombers footbal team: It's got the SIZE - big renderings.&lt;BR /&gt;
6: Camera control is adequate for flythroughs unlike in ArchiCAD where it is rudimentary.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here are MY observations:&lt;BR /&gt;
1: I love Artlantis as a playful experience. You can learn a ot about rendering quickly playing in Artlantis.&lt;BR /&gt;
2: LightWorks need expertise and patience.&lt;BR /&gt;
3: LightWorks has slowed down but gotten better in ArchiCAD 10.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have done paid work in LightWorks - I don't think it is productive enough or makes a sufficiently sophisticated image for professional work.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And besides, my heart is broken by Graphisoft's implementation of LightWorks. Just look at what this company's product can do when completely implemented:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.lightworks-user.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.lightworks-user.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Chose LightWorks if:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You have a tight relation between design and image - as do I with my work being public art - short turnaround time - a day, say, with lots of changes and evaluations. Rarely need huge renderings. Rarely need photorendering - often overlay a sketch rendering on a photorendering for final drawing.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Chose Artlantis if:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-- You aspire to being an illustrator and want to learn more. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-- You occasionally (often) need to disguise the weakness of your design work with wonderful luminous radiance.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In reviewing the possibility of doing an Artlantis book, I asked them who their buyers were "An architect who makes three renderings a year."&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Finally: &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I don't think of Artlantis as the end of the road. It is a coffee, powdered nasal excitement and gas stop. If you want to change your career, invest your time and money in real rendering/modeling programs like: Cinema 4D, LightWave, Electric Image, and the infamous but widely supported Threedee Studio. And others.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/LightWorks-in-ArchiCAD/m-p/39594#M18254</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-24T13:38:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LightWorks in ArchiCAD</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/LightWorks-in-ArchiCAD/m-p/39595#M18255</link>
      <description>Thank you Dwight for the input  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
I was interested in this issue because I'd like to see a complete design package with ArchiCAD... I don't like to pay for some features (render engines) in ArchiCAD and don't use it... I think ArchiCAD have good tools for lights, cameras, vr's and simple animations (That's enought for me). So... IMHO what is missing is a good render engine and also a material editor.&lt;BR /&gt;
What do you think about Maxwell Render. I know its render quality is impressive, although its speed is the slowest in the market but it has a plugin for ArchiCAD with a simple interface...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:35:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/LightWorks-in-ArchiCAD/m-p/39595#M18255</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-24T14:35:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

