<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Viz 2005 vs C4D in Visualization</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Viz-2005-vs-C4D/m-p/103798#M23280</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;hozichan wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Actually, I only know a little of them. &lt;BR /&gt;
Many archiCAD users use C4D for advance render (especially the lighting effect) , however, no one (very very few) would use C4D in our Univeristy or Hong Kong. They use 3D studio max, viz or Form Z in usual.  So I want to know more which software is good to me.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
THXS&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

As I said, the one you know how to use.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you are on ArchiCAD 9, as you are not, the Lightworks rendering (the same as in FormZ without radiosity) is more than enough.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The fact that not much is heard about other software than the most powerful one does not mean that it is best suited for what you do.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:04:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-01-29T17:04:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Viz 2005 vs C4D</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Viz-2005-vs-C4D/m-p/103795#M23277</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi! I'm student of MArch. I use archicad + art-lantis for my presentation mostly. Our computer lab. provide Viz 2005 and I have C4D 8.5(student version). &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Could anyone suggest the comparsion on these based on import time; render time; final result of image (both have radiosity); compatibility with archiCAD...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It's difficult to choose and 2nd semester is coming...&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 10:39:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Viz-2005-vs-C4D/m-p/103795#M23277</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T10:39:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viz 2005 vs C4D</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Viz-2005-vs-C4D/m-p/103796#M23278</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;hozichan wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Hi! I'm student of MArch. I use archicad + art-lantis for my presentation mostly. Our computer lab. provide Viz 2005 and I have C4D 8.5(student version). &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Could anyone suggest the comparsion on these based on import time; render time; final result of image (both have radiosity); compatibility with archiCAD...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It's difficult to choose and 2nd semester is coming...&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Which software are you more familiar with?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That is the key.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The software might have options, and features - it is how well you know to use them that gives the final result, in the designated time. Learning a whole new software when chasing deadline is never a good idea.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 06:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Viz-2005-vs-C4D/m-p/103796#M23278</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-28T06:30:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viz 2005 vs C4D</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Viz-2005-vs-C4D/m-p/103797#M23279</link>
      <description>Actually, I only know a little of them. &lt;BR /&gt;
Many archiCAD users use C4D for advance render (especially the lighting effect) , however, no one (very very few) would use C4D in our Univeristy or Hong Kong. They use 3D studio max, viz or Form Z in usual.  So I want to know more which software is good to me.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
THXS</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:03:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Viz-2005-vs-C4D/m-p/103797#M23279</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-28T16:03:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viz 2005 vs C4D</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Viz-2005-vs-C4D/m-p/103798#M23280</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;hozichan wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Actually, I only know a little of them. &lt;BR /&gt;
Many archiCAD users use C4D for advance render (especially the lighting effect) , however, no one (very very few) would use C4D in our Univeristy or Hong Kong. They use 3D studio max, viz or Form Z in usual.  So I want to know more which software is good to me.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
THXS&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

As I said, the one you know how to use.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you are on ArchiCAD 9, as you are not, the Lightworks rendering (the same as in FormZ without radiosity) is more than enough.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The fact that not much is heard about other software than the most powerful one does not mean that it is best suited for what you do.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:04:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Viz-2005-vs-C4D/m-p/103798#M23280</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-29T17:04:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

