<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Archilumos does it worth the price ? in Visualization</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4483#M23606</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TRIBU wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I tried to start NFR v.1.5  within 8.1 and it never worked. First impression is therefore bad, but I expect streamlined interface once I start it. I like concept of lights defined directly in ArchiCAD using IES files. Will see.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Try with 7 or 8?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-12-15T10:31:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Archilumos does it worth the price ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4478#M23601</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;Hello !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Has anybody seen Archilumos at work ?&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
The price in 700$ and there is no demo available for download. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The images on their site are good, but it would be nice to hear a user opinion.&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 14:02:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4478#M23601</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T14:02:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archilumos does it worth the price ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4479#M23602</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;zucoc wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;B&gt;Has anybody seen Archilumos at work ?&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
The price in 700$ and there is no demo available for download. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The images on their site are good, but it would be nice to hear a user opinion.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Well, Swedes, do I have to do a roll call? &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4479#M23602</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-12T18:13:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archilumos does it worth the price ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4480#M23603</link>
      <description>And one Canuck.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As far as radiosity rendering, Archilumos does perform as well as anything. It oprates right out of/within ArchiCAD - the user selects radiosity as an option.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is a quality solution for ArchiCAD users that can use official lamp luminosity profiles in determining light values.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The challenge is whether an architect should be trying to drive this application. Learning the set-ups for calculating radiosity is very time-consuming since shadows are mapped in polygonal subdivisions adapted to surface variations. I have  worked with it for a while experimentally and adjusting this dialog is tricky - failed images displlay staircasing in oblique shadows.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The price is comparable to other radiosity engines and provides direct output from ArchiCAD.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
There may be some issues with picture mapping- I have not explored that, yet.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:22:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4480#M23603</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-12T19:22:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archilumos does it worth the price ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4481#M23604</link>
      <description>I tried to start NFR v.1.5  within 8.1 and it never worked. First impression is therefore bad, but I expect streamlined interface once I start it. I like concept of lights defined directly in ArchiCAD using IES files. Will see.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4481#M23604</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-15T09:05:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archilumos does it worth the price ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4482#M23605</link>
      <description>It is true that Archiumos is not yet ready for 8.1.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Like most plug-ins trying to cope with the moving target that is ArchiCAD we can all hope that things settle down enough for all plug-ins to get updated. It seems to me that it has been at least a year since everything would work together.....</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:09:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4482#M23605</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-15T09:09:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archilumos does it worth the price ?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4483#M23606</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TRIBU wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I tried to start NFR v.1.5  within 8.1 and it never worked. First impression is therefore bad, but I expect streamlined interface once I start it. I like concept of lights defined directly in ArchiCAD using IES files. Will see.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Try with 7 or 8?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archilumos-does-it-worth-the-price/m-p/4483#M23606</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-15T10:31:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

