<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Archicad 29 Physical Based Rendering is useless in Visualization</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archicad-29-Physical-Based-Rendering-is-useless/m-p/679003#M26618</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Why is everything still blue like under water? That's the feature, colorblind programmer or 500K bulbs in Graphisoft HQ? BIMx viewer is perfect, Revit is nearly as good, this Avatar like filter is useless crap...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 07:42:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>laembert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-07T07:42:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Archicad 29 Physical Based Rendering is useless</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archicad-29-Physical-Based-Rendering-is-useless/m-p/679003#M26618</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why is everything still blue like under water? That's the feature, colorblind programmer or 500K bulbs in Graphisoft HQ? BIMx viewer is perfect, Revit is nearly as good, this Avatar like filter is useless crap...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 07:42:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Archicad-29-Physical-Based-Rendering-is-useless/m-p/679003#M26618</guid>
      <dc:creator>laembert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-07T07:42:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

