<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ArchiCad+Texture v Maxwell in Visualization</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/ArchiCad-Texture-v-Maxwell/m-p/285662#M2791</link>
    <description>No.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 01:59:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steve Jepson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-15T01:59:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArchiCad+Texture v Maxwell</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/ArchiCad-Texture-v-Maxwell/m-p/285661#M2790</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
  using ArchiCad/CineRender + good quality texture library could result good image near something like maxwell output?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 09:37:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/ArchiCad-Texture-v-Maxwell/m-p/285661#M2790</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T09:37:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCad+Texture v Maxwell</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/ArchiCad-Texture-v-Maxwell/m-p/285662#M2791</link>
      <description>No.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 01:59:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/ArchiCad-Texture-v-Maxwell/m-p/285662#M2791</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve Jepson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-15T01:59:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCad+Texture v Maxwell</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/ArchiCad-Texture-v-Maxwell/m-p/285663#M2792</link>
      <description>I don't think the cinerender physical renderer will be on par with a dedicated engine like maxwell, however: there are a lot of cinema 4d tutorials you can find to get you along, the preview is quick to give a good indication of materials/colour, it works fine for still images and there is no extra cost for getting a seperate engine.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Also kind of depends on your platform. MAC is kind of limited to high end CPU rendering, I'd say, whereas GPU rendering seems quite popular for windows machines.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 09:41:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/ArchiCad-Texture-v-Maxwell/m-p/285663#M2792</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erwin Edel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-15T09:41:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCad+Texture v Maxwell</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/ArchiCad-Texture-v-Maxwell/m-p/285664#M2793</link>
      <description>I think actually the biggest disadvantage is the missing possibility to output channels.&lt;BR /&gt;
But still, Maxwell is an unbiased renderer and treated properly it will produce pictures with the highest quality.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:10:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/ArchiCad-Texture-v-Maxwell/m-p/285664#M2793</guid>
      <dc:creator>runxel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-29T17:10:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

