<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Education version - low-resolution 3D exports? in Visualization</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Education-version-low-resolution-3D-exports/m-p/238242#M3279</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;*** This is a bit of an emergency as I have a school presentation tomorrow and I am unable to export my images correctly at the moment. ***&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
How do I create a 3D view that isn't terribly low resolution?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I keep running into this (I'm using AC21 but it was the same in 20). My 3D views look fine but when I want to export a 3D view (usually it's a bird's eye axonometric view with shadows on) and I  place it on a sheet, it looks very low resolution - thick, choppy linework.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I use OpenGL for the 3D view but Vectorial also appears choppy, even before I put it on a sheet or save the view. It's so low-res that it is higher-resolution for me to just take a screenshot than it is to export as an image or PDF.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is this a limitation placed on the Education version of Archicad? Or am I doing something wrong? I didn't have this issue using Archicad in an architecture office. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Very frustrating how unintuitive it is to fix something that should be very simple - exporting a PDF or image at a reasonable resolution. It's issues like this that are making me consider switching back to Revit. Any help would be appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 12:41:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-11T12:41:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Education version - low-resolution 3D exports?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Education-version-low-resolution-3D-exports/m-p/238242#M3279</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;*** This is a bit of an emergency as I have a school presentation tomorrow and I am unable to export my images correctly at the moment. ***&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
How do I create a 3D view that isn't terribly low resolution?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I keep running into this (I'm using AC21 but it was the same in 20). My 3D views look fine but when I want to export a 3D view (usually it's a bird's eye axonometric view with shadows on) and I  place it on a sheet, it looks very low resolution - thick, choppy linework.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I use OpenGL for the 3D view but Vectorial also appears choppy, even before I put it on a sheet or save the view. It's so low-res that it is higher-resolution for me to just take a screenshot than it is to export as an image or PDF.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is this a limitation placed on the Education version of Archicad? Or am I doing something wrong? I didn't have this issue using Archicad in an architecture office. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Very frustrating how unintuitive it is to fix something that should be very simple - exporting a PDF or image at a reasonable resolution. It's issues like this that are making me consider switching back to Revit. Any help would be appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 12:41:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Visualization/Education-version-low-resolution-3D-exports/m-p/238242#M3279</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-11T12:41:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

