<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: I wish Archicad constructor could have improved a lot in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/I-wish-Archicad-constructor-could-have-improved-a-lot/m-p/108182#M10588</link>
    <description>Hi Ashok,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
"Wishes" are for people who fully understand the abilities of an aspect of the product and have found a deficiency that they wish to have implemented.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Your post seems to indicate that you do not understand how Constructor works in conjunction with Estimator (I don't even understand that fully yet - I don't have a copy) ... since you have seen only a demo.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Modeling for 5D via Constructor is not the same as modeling in ArchiCAD.  Your wish seems more tuned to ArchiCAD to me, on first reading.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This discussion belongs in the "Other Products" general forum (or possibly ArchiCAD+), not here, IMHO.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
On second reading, perhaps you used the word 'constructor' without realizing that Graphisoft has a product by that name, and you really mean the "slab accessory" tool.  If so, post in "Working in ArchiCAD" with a screenshot of your problem and what you want to have happen.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-06-21T17:14:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>I wish Archicad constructor could have improved a lot</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/I-wish-Archicad-constructor-could-have-improved-a-lot/m-p/108181#M10587</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi&lt;BR /&gt;
Iam working om Bim COncept, but iam not happy by seeing the constructor demo, let me start first from foundation, i would like to have a seperate element as foundation with some standard templates inbuilt,which could have been induced in slab accessories, i will be waisting the time in going on creating the templates alone.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:42:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/I-wish-Archicad-constructor-could-have-improved-a-lot/m-p/108181#M10587</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-21T07:42:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I wish Archicad constructor could have improved a lot</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/I-wish-Archicad-constructor-could-have-improved-a-lot/m-p/108182#M10588</link>
      <description>Hi Ashok,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
"Wishes" are for people who fully understand the abilities of an aspect of the product and have found a deficiency that they wish to have implemented.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Your post seems to indicate that you do not understand how Constructor works in conjunction with Estimator (I don't even understand that fully yet - I don't have a copy) ... since you have seen only a demo.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Modeling for 5D via Constructor is not the same as modeling in ArchiCAD.  Your wish seems more tuned to ArchiCAD to me, on first reading.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This discussion belongs in the "Other Products" general forum (or possibly ArchiCAD+), not here, IMHO.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
On second reading, perhaps you used the word 'constructor' without realizing that Graphisoft has a product by that name, and you really mean the "slab accessory" tool.  If so, post in "Working in ArchiCAD" with a screenshot of your problem and what you want to have happen.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/I-wish-Archicad-constructor-could-have-improved-a-lot/m-p/108182#M10588</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-21T17:14:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I wish Archicad constructor could have improved a lot</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/I-wish-Archicad-constructor-could-have-improved-a-lot/m-p/108183#M10589</link>
      <description>Hello Karl&lt;BR /&gt;
May be the way of expressing my ideas was not in right manner,&lt;BR /&gt;
Iam a strong beliver that archicad is best and it cant beat any other software, iam using this software past 4 years now, ihave worked on version from Archicad 7.0 to Archicad 9.0, since i have worked on complete elements of  the building in one of the project recently using archicad 9.0, i have started with a footing using a slab tool,stem wall using a wall tool,and studs using object tool, and other  elements and completed the project in a span of 2 weeks, i know this cant be achived in any other software also, may be u r true since i have gone only a demo i haven't understood the concept of Archicad constructor 2005.  may be in future after i use the Archicad constructor i may understand the concept.&lt;BR /&gt;
thanks for replying</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:24:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/I-wish-Archicad-constructor-could-have-improved-a-lot/m-p/108183#M10589</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-22T04:24:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

