<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Listing Object components created in the property script in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Listing-Object-components-created-in-the-property-script/m-p/136401#M14653</link>
    <description>Hi Karl,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You are right. When I did a simple search here in the forum it gave me lots of unrelated subjects. Perhaps it would be more easy to change the "Calculation Component" word, once its more like a hidden feature. &lt;E&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/E&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Karl wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Object components cannot be scheduled with the interactive schedules - you have to use the old-style list schemes.  Unless I'm too tired right now to think.  Which is possible.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
I was afraid to hear that... By now, the best I could manage was a "basic component list". The one which is a simple txt file... not a "real" table.  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_sad.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I guess I'll have to re-think the listing features of my object.  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_rolleyes.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for the insight.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:45:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-11T11:45:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Listing Object components created in the property script</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Listing-Object-components-created-in-the-property-script/m-p/136399#M14651</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Hi Folks,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm scripting a quite complex object and I'm having some trouble creating a list of scripted components within the property script.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It seems that there is no option for selecting objects in the list setup.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is it possible?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/7951i81AE4365C93E0CC7/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="screen_01.jpg" title="screen_01.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:41:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Listing-Object-components-created-in-the-property-script/m-p/136399#M14651</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-10T16:41:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Listing Object components created in the property script</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Listing-Object-components-created-in-the-property-script/m-p/136400#M14652</link>
      <description>Hi Paulo,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You've run into something that I complained about to deaf ears when it first happened.  Graphisoft uses the word "component" for three totally unrelated things in ArchiCAD.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Anything built with complex profiles or composites has a 'component' represented by each unique fill.  These of course have nothing to do with components that are part of GDL objects, or equivalently property scripts attached to objects and elements.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Object components cannot be scheduled with the interactive schedules - you have to use the old-style list schemes.  Unless I'm too tired right now to think.  Which is possible.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:31:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Listing-Object-components-created-in-the-property-script/m-p/136400#M14652</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-11T04:31:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Listing Object components created in the property script</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Listing-Object-components-created-in-the-property-script/m-p/136401#M14653</link>
      <description>Hi Karl,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You are right. When I did a simple search here in the forum it gave me lots of unrelated subjects. Perhaps it would be more easy to change the "Calculation Component" word, once its more like a hidden feature. &lt;E&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/E&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Karl wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Object components cannot be scheduled with the interactive schedules - you have to use the old-style list schemes.  Unless I'm too tired right now to think.  Which is possible.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
I was afraid to hear that... By now, the best I could manage was a "basic component list". The one which is a simple txt file... not a "real" table.  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_sad.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I guess I'll have to re-think the listing features of my object.  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_rolleyes.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for the insight.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:45:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Listing-Object-components-created-in-the-property-script/m-p/136401#M14653</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-11T11:45:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

