<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Calculation anomalies in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Calculation-anomalies/m-p/142734#M15547</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;An AC 11 question:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Not that it matters much, but can anyone explain why I get slightly different values for the volume of a column depending on where the value appears? In my particular case:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Bill of Quantities (IS) says 9.56 cu. ft.&lt;BR /&gt;
Element Information Palette says 9.67 trimmed and 9.62 untrimmed (and why is "trimmed" a higher value than "untrimmed"?)&lt;BR /&gt;
An Element List says 9.67 (consistent with the Element Information Palette)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As far as I can tell, nothing is intersecting the column. Calculation preferences for volume are set to "cubic feet" and 2 decimals. Extra Accuracy is "Off". There is no veneer to the column.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If I use a calculator, I get 9.62 cu. ft. without any significant rounding (14" round x 9' high).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Using feet for calculation and the rounding preferences (2 decimals, including for pi) on my calculator generates a slightly lower number 9.51 (using .58 for 7"), too low to explain the differences noted above.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I note that column parameters in the IS Scheme Settings include "Core Volume", "Veneer Volume", and "Volume of the Column". I would expect the calculation methods to be the same for wherever the value appears, but maybe they're not.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Over the years I've noticed on occasion minor differences (&amp;lt;1%) between what an Element List shows and what my calculator will produce. Anyone else experience this?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Craig Bagley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-06T01:13:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Calculation anomalies</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Calculation-anomalies/m-p/142734#M15547</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;An AC 11 question:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Not that it matters much, but can anyone explain why I get slightly different values for the volume of a column depending on where the value appears? In my particular case:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Bill of Quantities (IS) says 9.56 cu. ft.&lt;BR /&gt;
Element Information Palette says 9.67 trimmed and 9.62 untrimmed (and why is "trimmed" a higher value than "untrimmed"?)&lt;BR /&gt;
An Element List says 9.67 (consistent with the Element Information Palette)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As far as I can tell, nothing is intersecting the column. Calculation preferences for volume are set to "cubic feet" and 2 decimals. Extra Accuracy is "Off". There is no veneer to the column.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If I use a calculator, I get 9.62 cu. ft. without any significant rounding (14" round x 9' high).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Using feet for calculation and the rounding preferences (2 decimals, including for pi) on my calculator generates a slightly lower number 9.51 (using .58 for 7"), too low to explain the differences noted above.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I note that column parameters in the IS Scheme Settings include "Core Volume", "Veneer Volume", and "Volume of the Column". I would expect the calculation methods to be the same for wherever the value appears, but maybe they're not.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Over the years I've noticed on occasion minor differences (&amp;lt;1%) between what an Element List shows and what my calculator will produce. Anyone else experience this?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Calculation-anomalies/m-p/142734#M15547</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig Bagley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-06T01:13:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

