<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MEP Collision Detector in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/MEP-Collision-Detector/m-p/143137#M15616</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I want to know what's the purpose of this tool... it's inevitable for pipes and ducts to collide with walls and ceilings, why would I need a mark up on every single collision? And also, it would be nice if the MEP elements could be be assigned a building material.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:06:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-06T02:06:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MEP Collision Detector</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/MEP-Collision-Detector/m-p/143137#M15616</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I want to know what's the purpose of this tool... it's inevitable for pipes and ducts to collide with walls and ceilings, why would I need a mark up on every single collision? And also, it would be nice if the MEP elements could be be assigned a building material.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:06:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/MEP-Collision-Detector/m-p/143137#M15616</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-06T02:06:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

