<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147475#M16264</link>
    <description>Looks like Wrathchild already beat me to it, but I'll continue anyway.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/12359i2E413610009CEB7F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="schedule.jpg" title="schedule.jpg" /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vistasp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-01-03T16:06:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147470#M16259</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;I am sorry, but can anyone recommend me a way for creating door schedule with quantity of Left/Right oriented doors? I want to count the quantities for doors  which really have orientation, but double-sided doors are divided by this criteria too  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; ! Can I get overall number only for such non-oriented doors from standard ArchiCAD library (AC 12) without changing GDL code for them?&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 21:06:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147470#M16259</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-02T21:06:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147471#M16260</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Leo wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I am sorry, but can anyone recommend me a way for creating door schedule with quantity of Left/Right oriented doors? I want to count the quantities for doors  which really have orientation, but double-sided doors are divided by this criteria too  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; ! Can I get overall number only for such non-oriented doors from standard ArchiCAD library (AC 12) without changing GDL code for them?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

You could use their ID's, making left and and right hand (or however you want them designated) have all the same ID or an ID that starts the same.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 07:45:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147471#M16260</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T07:45:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147472#M16261</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;You could use their ID's, making left and and right hand (or however you want them designated) have all the same ID or an ID that starts the same.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Yes, we can put a lot of information in this very useful box  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Do you mean that it's better to create two different schedules: one for oriented and other for non-oriented doors with door's ID as a selection filter?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:55:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147472#M16261</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T13:55:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147473#M16262</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Leo wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;You could use their ID's, making left and and right hand (or however you want them designated) have all the same ID or an ID that starts the same.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Yes, we can put a lot of information in this very useful box  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Do you mean that it's better to create two different schedules: one for oriented and other for non-oriented doors with door's ID as a selection filter?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

No need two have to different schedules.  I did this real quick with one of my schedules to try it out.  I just put either RH or LH in each door's ID.  Of course you can change the ID Header to whatever you want it to say.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147473#M16262</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T16:05:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147474#M16263</link>
      <description>Leo, if you play around with the IDs and the Scheme Settings of the schedule, you can do what I think you want to do.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Note that both single doors have been given the same ID even though they have different swings. The double door has a different ID.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The next screenshot shows the schedule. If you play around with the scheme settings (highlighted) you can tell the schedule how to sort the objects.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:05:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147474#M16263</guid>
      <dc:creator>vistasp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T16:05:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147475#M16264</link>
      <description>Looks like Wrathchild already beat me to it, but I'll continue anyway.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/12359i2E413610009CEB7F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="schedule.jpg" title="schedule.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147475#M16264</guid>
      <dc:creator>vistasp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T16:06:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147476#M16265</link>
      <description>In my example I'm not talking about the door marker ID.  I'm talking about the ID in the info box.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147476#M16265</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T16:10:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147477#M16266</link>
      <description>Thank you, guys. But I see some cons about your idea.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
At first, ArchiCAD already does a lot of work for us when it let us to set door's swing visually. Why should we ignore this information? For example, user can place some right-oriented door with proper ID (thanks to Favorites, for example), but he can change it's swing later without changing ID! So it tends  to produce inconsistencies between graphic and schedules.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Another problem relates to our local schedules standard. We have to create a table with one door type per row. There are three cells in each row for quantity: quantity of left-swinged, quantity of right-swinged, and overall quantity. And ArchiCAD lets me generate this table automatically for oriented doors. But for non-oriented I have some quantity in all this cells. It produces a lot of stupid questions  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; . I prefer to have zeros at first two cells, but empty cells would be much  better.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So, I asked Wrathchild about two schedules because making two different schedules is a kind of solution. If we haven't any other ways...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am sorry for bad definition of my problem at the beginning of this thread.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:49:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147477#M16266</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T16:49:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147478#M16267</link>
      <description>If you leave the ID blank for the non-oriented door then the cells will be left empty.  Of course this assumes you're not using the ID for another reason and can leave it blank</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:01:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147478#M16267</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T17:01:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147479#M16268</link>
      <description>I am sorry, Wrathchild, but we are talking about quantities, aren't we? Empty ID field can't solve the problem with countable fields  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_cry.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:36:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147479#M16268</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T18:36:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147480#M16269</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Leo wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I am sorry, Wrathchild, but we are talking about quantities, aren't we? Empty ID field can't solve the problem with countable fields  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_cry.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

There's a separate field for the quantities in your scheme settings.  Go to scheme settings.  One of your fields will be Quantity and one will be ID.&lt;BR /&gt;
The quantity field will count and the ID field will filter.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:44:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147480#M16269</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T18:44:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147481#M16270</link>
      <description>Looking back at your post, this might not work for you exactly as you want.  You would have to have separate rows for RH and LH doors.  Not sure if you can live with that or not.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:53:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147481#M16270</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T18:53:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147482#M16271</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;You would have to have separate rows for RH and LH doors. Not sure if you can live with that or not. &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Unfortunately, I can't go with it. I have to put quantities of left/right opened doors and overall quantity of this particular type of doors on one row.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:06:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147482#M16271</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T19:06:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147483#M16272</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Leo wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;At first, ArchiCAD already does a lot of work for us when it let us to set door's swing visually. Why should we ignore this information?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I agree.  It is a bit embarrassing for GS that doors store so much parametric information, and yet one cannot retrieve the swing orientation.  The LHS/RHS info could be easily computed by the door objects - which have to take into account their own 'mirror' and 'flip' status - yet it is not.  Scheduling the swing is a pretty basic concept, and I agree with you Leo that it should be computed from the model, not retrieve from manually entered data fields which can easily become incorrect.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I disagree with Wraithchild on the use of the ID field in this case, which IMHO should be reserved for the marker.  All doors and windows have plenty of user defined text fields to store other data, such as RHS/LHS, etc.  The ID field, combined with Element ID Manager, is designed for and more appropriate for window/door labeling.&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;There are three cells in each row for quantity: quantity of left-swinged, quantity of right-swinged, and overall quantity.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

ArchiCAD will let you create a group header for each of the three types of door quantities, but each total would appear in its own row (three rows).  I don't know of a way to get ArchiCAD to directly generate a single row with the totals in three columns - other than publishing the schedule as CSV and letting an Excel pivot table (or database query/report) reformat the data.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Sorry nothing positive to suggest,&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:09:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147483#M16272</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T19:09:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147484#M16273</link>
      <description>Karl makes a lot of sense.  The RH or LH should go into one of the User Defined parameters instead.  I've been using custom ID in my door marker settings but I'll be rethinking that now.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Wrathchild&amp;lt;-------bows to the master   &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_wink.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:19:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147484#M16273</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T19:19:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147485#M16274</link>
      <description>&lt;B&gt;Karl Ottenstein wrote&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;The LHS/RHS info could be easily computed by the door objects - which have to take into account their own 'mirror' and 'flip' status - yet it is not.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Thank you, Karl, for your answer. But I thought that "W/D opening orientation" field in List Schemas worked well for oriented doors. According to my experiments, the field changes status after flipping, mirroring e.t.c. Why did you say that this functionality haven't implemented yet?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147485#M16274</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T19:48:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147486#M16275</link>
      <description>Sorry, Leo, you are correct that 'Orientation' gives the hinge side.  I remembered that there was a problem, and forgot what it was!  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_redface.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The problem relates to at least the US libraries, which have an 'outside' and an 'inside' attribute for the door panel as well as the casing etc.  In the US at least, we often have different materials on one side of a door or window than the other - most often metal cladding on the exterior.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You had wanted to get an inventory of door panels based on how the hinges would mount.  But, with the US library, this is slightly problematic due to a library bug.  When you place a door, the eyeball is clicked towards what is to be treated as the 'outside', and towards the hinge side.  If the door is then supposed to swing inside, it is flipped as the next step.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But, in the US lib, if you have assigned materials to 'outside' and place a left hinge door and flip the door to swing 'in' (giving you a right hinge door), the casing still has the outside material, but the bug is that the door materials are reversed - with what is supposed to be the exterior material now on the inside.  You have to manually edit the door and assign the interior material to 'outside' and the exterior material to 'inside'.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you place the same door and have it swing out, right hinge, without editing to fix the bug, the schedule would show both door panels to be the same, even if you were to include the material parameters to further group the panels without editing the door.  So, without manual editing to work around the bug, any time a door is flipped, it might show up in the schedule as being the same type of slab as another door when it in fact has different materials or cladding.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I don't know about the INT library - if it has this inside/outside concept.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But, yes, you are right - Orientation is adequate if materials are uniform!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:19:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147486#M16275</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T21:19:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147487#M16276</link>
      <description>This thread listed another problems with swing scheduling, but with list schema rather than (interactive) element schedules:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=24379&amp;amp;postdays=0&amp;amp;postorder=desc&amp;amp;&amp;amp;start=0" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/vie ... c&amp;amp;&amp;amp;start=0"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=24379&amp;amp;postdays=0&amp;amp;postorder=desc&amp;amp;&amp;amp;start=0&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:22:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147487#M16276</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-03T21:22:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147488#M16277</link>
      <description>Thank you, Karl, for you so informative answer. it's really very interesting for me.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have international and russian versions of ArchiCAD Library. As I understand from testing, they haven't the bug with materials of internal/external sides of doors. Fortunately, the bug with 3D symbol doesn't important for me.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It seems to me, that I have achieved my goal. I have created custom graphic template, which does all work for me. List Schema let us to get several totals at one row. But I am afraid, that Graphisoft can get rid of List Schemas in the future  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; . &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Anyway, one remark about door schedules. Why do you prefer to save door type information with each instance of library part? I think that it would be much better to choose some library door as a base for a real door  and sort instances according to their parameters. We can use a very simple Property Object for that. For example:&lt;BR /&gt;
1. Create new database for door types. Create several keys in this database - one per subtype of the base real door. Name the keys according to real names of that subtype. &lt;BR /&gt;
2. Create simple property object, which would analyze main library door parameters (name of the library part, orientation, flipping, width, height, e.t.c.) and select one component for the door from our database, according to results. We can create a template for this object and slightly change it for each "real" door.&lt;BR /&gt;
3. Link this property object by criteria with selected library door.&lt;BR /&gt;
4. Create Interactive schedule with component name as a field and enjoy. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In this way we can always check ourself about all door instances in our project - just schedule doors without components. If you save door identifiers inside each instancy, you can relay on your accuracy only.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Sorry, I am not sure that I describe the approach clearly  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; .</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:59:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147488#M16277</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-04T21:59:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Opening orientation of double-sided doors</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147489#M16278</link>
      <description>Sorry, I went wrong in my previous post. Graphisoft don't give us any chance to use library part's components and descriptors in interactive schedules.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But still, I believe that "library part to real element" approach is better than "ID to real element" approach. &lt;BR /&gt;
In this way we can use parameter script for analysing current state of the library part and redefining some of it's "Listing" parameters accordingly. So, it seems to be a kind of solution for a task, which Erika told about here &lt;A href="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=136434#136434" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/vie ... 434#136434"&gt;http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?p=136434#136434&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;. We can write a macro for analysing XML (or CSV) and call it from parameter script of each library part, which we use in our project. The macro will change parameters of all placed instances accordingly to the XML file. So, out interactive schedules will be changed like after import.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:15:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Opening-orientation-of-double-sided-doors/m-p/147489#M16278</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-06T15:15:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

