<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Interactive Schedule Frustration!!! in Collaboration with other software</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Interactive-Schedule-Frustration/m-p/171173#M19811</link>
    <description>I can see a small difference between that third cell in the schedule and the layout.&lt;BR /&gt;
On the schedule it does not have that tag in the lower right corner, in the Layout it does.&lt;BR /&gt;
I wonder if that has anything to do with it.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:26:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-12T13:26:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interactive Schedule Frustration!!!</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Interactive-Schedule-Frustration/m-p/171172#M19810</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;The more i use the interactive schedules, the more frustrated i get with it's user-unfriendliness; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
a case in point: in the attached pdf, the top image shows the schedule window while the bottom image is that schedule place onto a layout.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
can anyone explain why the change in location of the last door drawing? i have no idea.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/71663iDE662C29E112D00C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="archicad schedule issue_120710.jpg" title="archicad schedule issue_120710.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:37:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Interactive-Schedule-Frustration/m-p/171172#M19810</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-12T08:37:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interactive Schedule Frustration!!!</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Interactive-Schedule-Frustration/m-p/171173#M19811</link>
      <description>I can see a small difference between that third cell in the schedule and the layout.&lt;BR /&gt;
On the schedule it does not have that tag in the lower right corner, in the Layout it does.&lt;BR /&gt;
I wonder if that has anything to do with it.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:26:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Interactive-Schedule-Frustration/m-p/171173#M19811</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-12T13:26:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interactive Schedule Frustration!!!</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Interactive-Schedule-Frustration/m-p/171174#M19812</link>
      <description>hi Laszlo, thanks for the reply;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
i actually posted the wrong image; that one was the first one i did and i also noted the slight difference so i changed it and tried again (see updated attached image) with no difference. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
the 'tags' have been added using the annotate function in the schedule window - as far as i'm aware, this is what the annotate function is supposed to be for, adding text/dimensions etc. to the basic view that's automatically generated.  if annotation is affecting the layout, i think its a serious flaw in the functionality of the tool.  however, i don't think this is what's causing the problem but i still have no idea what it could be.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:07:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Interactive-Schedule-Frustration/m-p/171174#M19812</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-13T04:07:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interactive Schedule Frustration!!!</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Interactive-Schedule-Frustration/m-p/171175#M19813</link>
      <description>Kombibob, one idea:&lt;BR /&gt;
Could you check the Oversize settings for these different Windows?&lt;BR /&gt;
I am wondering it some upper oversize is set for that third windows.&lt;BR /&gt;
If not, then I would report this as a bug.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:07:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Interactive-Schedule-Frustration/m-p/171175#M19813</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laszlo Nagy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-13T08:07:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interactive Schedule Frustration!!!</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Interactive-Schedule-Frustration/m-p/171176#M19814</link>
      <description>I checked the settings and all seemed ok;&lt;BR /&gt;
after some more testing, it's definitely the text elements that i've placed in the annotation window that is throwing out the alignment; that, to me, is a bug and i will report it.&lt;BR /&gt;
thanks for your help.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 02:27:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Collaboration-with-other/Interactive-Schedule-Frustration/m-p/171176#M19814</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-14T02:27:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

